The Wolf And The Neural Network
This document Can be found: (July 9th 2025)
Name: 2025-07-09_Response_to_RCMP_June-6_Letter_and_CRCC_Investigation_Request.docx
HTML: https://tinyurl.com/uawbhwr8
DOC: https://tinyurl.com/yckf3apj
GOOGLE DOC: https://tinyurl.com/3dwe3wx5
Video Summary of this document and events: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkbkumKe-Hs
Table of Contents
May 10th 2025 Detailed CRCC Submission 5
April 2025 – Ongoing case with Shelly Mews and Curt Wallace RCMP Special Victims Unit 5
Systemic Breakdown in CRCC–RCMP Coordination 6
Allegations listed by Cory Bushell (Page 2): 8
Allegation #1: Neglect of Duty 8
Allegation #2: Bias — Sexual Orientation 8
Clarification on Allegation #1: Neglect of Duty 8
Clarification on Allegation #2: Bias — Sexual Orientation 8
🧾 Ongoing Engagement and CRCC Acknowledgment 11
Public Record and Intentional Neglect 12
🧾 Verified Timeline and Interactions with Corporal Jessica Welke 13
📞 Verified Call – May 24, 2023 (Contradicting RCMP Fabrication) 14
Rebuttal Regarding Versadex File 2022-154357 and Constable Chad Sanford – Page 5 19
Evidence of Deliberate Fabrication and Malicious Intent 23
Conclusion: Misconduct Warranting Immediate Review 24
Response to RCMP’s Apology for 800+ Day Delay 29
March 13, 2023 – Scott Jewers record of Events: 32
March 13, 2023 – RCMP Record of Event. 38
March 13, 2023 – NSHA Record of Event (Hana Marie Weimer): 39
Breakdown: Fraud, Misrepresentation, and Defamation by NSHA, Hana Marie Weimer, and RCMP 42
Hana Marie Weimer and NSHA – Coordinated Retaliation and Record Fraud 45
Review – This “Investigation” was not done in good faith, and is wrought with Malice. 47
🚫 Conflict of Interest Ignored, Then Weaponized 47
🗂️ Fabricated Dismissals With No Evidence Cited 47
⏳ Unlawful Delay and Manufactured Closure 47
🔇 Key Evidence and Context Deliberately Omitted 48
🧾 False Claims Regarding Email and Threats 48
Resources – Tiny URLs to Long URLS’s: 62
For reader convenience, this document uses TinyURLs to shorten long and complex web addresses. These TinyURLs are functionally identical to the original links — they simply redirect to the full destination URL. You can reduce URL of hundreds of Characters, to a few dozen. Through this document, in the main flow i will use tiny URL for references while for transparency and archival purposes, i will try to post all original full URLs corresponding to each TinyURL at the end of this document. This ensures full traceability, should any short links become inaccessible in the future.
On June 6, 2025, Scott Jewers received a formal letter from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) regarding his public complaint to the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission (CRCC) concerning Corporal Jessica Welke of the Sheet Harbour RCMP Detachment as well as other officers. The letter was issued by Inspector Cory Bushell, Operations Officer of the Halifax Regional RCMP Detachment, located at 1171 Cole Harbour Road, Cole Harbour, NS (file reference 2023-1031). The full text of that document was extracted, and can be found at the end of this document.
The internal RCMP file number is 2023-521587. Notably, the CRCC case number is not listed in the correspondence. Instead, the field labeled “CRCC File #” includes only the placeholder text: “CCETP no de reference.” The documents are dated June 4, 2025. While the original CRCC case was opened March 27th 2023. This means the case was opened 800 days as of June 4thth 2025.
The following individuals are directly referenced in the RCMP’s response:
Justin Hall, from RCMP Sheet Harbour will also be included in mine.
On Page 1, Inspector Bushell asserts:
“A thorough investigation has been conducted into your allegations by Sergeant Trevor Allen, who is an experienced investigator.”
On May 10th, 2025, at 1:48PM PM, I submitted a 51-page, evidence-backed complaint directly to Paul (CRCC Intake Manager) and the CRCC office. Paul confirmed receipt at 9:24 PM the same evening. This document included chronologically ordered, cross-referenced, and clearly outlined evidence that directly and proactively rebutted the narrative now being presented by Sergeant Jeff Stevens, Sergeant Trevor Allen, Inspector Cory Bushell, and Ignatius Hall.
May 10th 2025 – 2025-05-10_CRCC-Detailed-Submission_TWNN-Final.docx:
Document Tiny URL: https://tinyurl.com/rfwwuhb8
HTML Tiny URL: https://tinyurl.com/3kuxmvc5
Google Doc Tiny URL: https://tinyurl.com/jv2xmks5
The content of that submission not only validated my prior statements to Sergeant Jeff Stevens, but also explained precisely why I requested remote communication due to institutional retaliation — a fact the RCMP continues to omit or mischaracterize as “non-cooperation.” My persistence with the CRCC was grounded in this systematic pattern of misrepresentation, defamation, and retaliatory behavior. That evidence was ready and available had these parties made any genuine effort to contact me or review it.
In addition to the points raised, and as part of the ongoing investigation involving Shelly Mews and Curt Wallace of RCMP, I placed a phone call on May 3, 2025, to the RCMP at 902-220-2013 under Case Number 2025-21595. During this call, I released detailed evidence directly implicating these events and these officers' involvement.
This call — which is now publicly documented — further reinforces that I have been consistent, forthcoming, and actively cooperating with authorities.
In contrast, Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen appear to have knowingly fabricated a false record, which is now contradicted not only by the content of this call but also by the broader evidentiary timeline.
📞 Call to Curt Wallace and Shelly Mews, RCMP Special Victims Unit – Requesting Criminal Charges (May 3, 2025):
🔗 https://youtu.be/9tZoNy0to7k
This call stands as further proof that any claims of ambiguity or non-cooperation are factually indefensible and must be formally addressed by the CRCC and oversight bodies.
There is an open and ongoing case with CSIS. Clearly, they did not consider the evidence disjointed or disorganized.
Showing how consistent and prepared i was. It’s reasonable these officers seen that, and proactively retaliated:
Call to Curt Wallace and Shelly Mews RCMP Special Victim Unit asking to press charges 2025 05 03 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tZoNy0to7k
Given the timeline, it is reasonable to conclude that the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission (CRCC) — and specifically Paul — failed to forward my May 10, 2025 submission to Sergeant Trevor Allen, Ignatius Hall, or Inspector Cory Bushell before the RCMP issued their rushed Final Report on June 4, 2025. This report was delivered just 25 days after my submission, despite the CRCC file being open for nearly 800 days (March 27, 2023 – June 2025). In January 2024, the CRCC formally acknowledged that Sergeant Jeff Stevens represented a conflict of interest. That was over 500 days ago. And yet, even under newly assigned officers, the RCMP made no effort to contact me. The CRCC’s own record confirms I remained in contact and repeatedly followed up. Despite that, both the CRCC and RCMP failed to reference or acknowledge:
• the May 10 submission
• the extensive evidence it contained (including the website and documentation)
• the reported sexual assault
• the broader national security and systemic failures described
This results in two distinct investigative baselines:
• a pending, evidence-rich CRCC submission from May 10, 2025
• a premature and factually incomplete RCMP Final Report issued June 4, 2025
The contrast between these records — in detail, evidentiary scope, and factual accuracy — speaks for itself. The RCMP closed their investigation without ever contacting me. Notably, they ensured that Corporal Jessica Welke did not provide a written statement, meaning no formal record exists that could be examined in court or clarify her role. The result is a report that misrepresents material facts, omits core allegations, and ignores both the documented abuse and its national implications.
A detailed rebuttal and forensic breakdown of the RCMP’s June 4, 2025 Final Report is now warranted. This response will methodically document:
— That Corporal Welke neglected her duties by failing to investigate your complaints and failing to follow up with you.
— That Corporal Welke discriminated against you based on your sexual orientation.
This allegation spans from August 16, 2022, to the present, with reasonable evidence suggesting that Corporal Jessica Welke may have been involved prior to that date. In their report, Inspector Cory Bushell and Sergeant Trevor Allen attempt to deflect from the core issue by omitting a substantial body of evidence between August 2022 and March 13, 2023.
That period is crucial. On March 13, 2023, the Nova Scotia Health Authority (NSHA) issued an execution order, and I was falsely arrested by my abusers within NSHA — individuals already facing multimillion-dollar litigation and potential criminal charges for fraud. These individuals knew I had submitted detailed reports, possessed audio recordings, and had made numerous attempts to open a case with RCMP.
This false arrest and the resulting defamation were not procedural errors. They were the direct consequence of sustained RCMP negligence: repeated refusals to open a case, combined with retaliatory conduct after I tried to assert my legal rights and report institutional abuse.
The conduct of Inspector Bushell and Sergeant Allen now exemplifies that same Neglect of Duty. They concluded I was guilty without ever contacting me — instead relying on NSHA’s execution order, issued by my abusers, without a single piece of written evidence showing any threats or confirming I was even present at any location. Meanwhile, I had already submitted extensive, verifiable evidence — well before March 13, 2023.
The RCMP’s Final Report includes Allegation #2, asserting that Corporal Jessica Welke discriminated against me based on my sexual orientation. I want to make this explicitly clear:
At no point have I ever claimed that Corporal Welke — or any RCMP member — made comments about my sexual orientation, nor have I suggested that it was ever discussed.
This allegation is completely fabricated and unsupported by the record. Across:
Nowhere will any claim of direct discrimination based on sexual orientation be found, nor have i ever stated they made any comments. It does not exist because it was never made.
This false allegation reflects a broader problem:
I request immediate clarification from the CRCC on where this allegation originated, and whether it was inserted by RCMP personnel or misinterpreted during internal processing. This error casts serious doubt on the integrity of the investigative process and further reinforces the need for independent review.
“...In May 2024, your investigation was reassigned to Sergeant Trevor Allen. In his police report Sergeant Stevens documented several attempts to meet with you for this investigation. You declined to meet him and stated you did not trust the police. Due to this, the investigator was unable to verify what allegations you wished to be investigated or have you sign the public complaint form (4110e). Sergeant Allen reviewed the correspondence you provided to CRCC and identified the above noted neglect of duty and bias allegations against Corporal Jessica Welke..”
This claim is false and misleading.
While there was discussion of a possible meeting, Scott Jewers made it clear — from the outset — that he did not feel safe meeting in person due to documented retaliation and abuse by members of both the Halifax Regional Police (HRP) and the RCMP, beginning on August 2, 2022 — the date of his false arrest and the onset of coordinated retaliation by NSHA, HRP, and other involved parties.
Scott Jewers informed Sergeant Jeff Stevens that under those conditions, no lawyer or rational party would advise a complainant to sit alone in a police detachment with an RCMP officer — particularly one aware that the complaint implicated Commissioner Dennis Daley and RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme.
Scott Jewers requested that the matter proceed via telephone — a reasonable, safety-based request grounded in trauma-informed best practices. Sergeant Stevens refused, stating something to the effect of, “It never happened unless we met in person.”
As a result, Scott Jewers continued to contact the CRCC, repeatedly raising concerns about Sergeant Stevens’ conduct and urging the Commission to assign another representative to the file. It was clear that something was wrong, and Scott Jewers sought appropriate oversight to ensure his complaint would not be quietly discarded or obstructed.
The response of Sergeant Jeff Stevens effectively denied Scott Jewers the ability to proceed and attempted to coerce compliance under unsafe and inappropriate conditions. This was not a refusal to cooperate, but a request for basic procedural accommodation — one that any victim of institutional misconduct is entitled to under contemporary standards of investigative integrity.
Furthermore, at no point was Scott Jewers asked to sign the RCMP Public Complaint Form (4110e), nor was he informed of any requirement to do so by Sergeant Stevens. Instead, Scott Jewers proactively contacted the CRCC to report this behavior, request oversight, and insist that appropriate follow-up be initiated. (Page 4)
On September 23, 2024, the CRCC confirmed that they directed Sgt. Trevor Allen to contact me following my request for investigator engagement. No such contact ever occurred. Despite this, on July 6, 2025, Sgt. Trevor Allen and Inspector Cory Bushell issued a formal RCMP letter implying due process had occurred. This is demonstrably false. Their conduct constitutes a breach of procedural fairness and likely fraud. I request this be formally reviewed, the letter struck from the record, and an independent investigation initiated into the conduct of both Allen and Bushell.
Despite the RCMP’s refusal to accommodate reasonable safeguards, Scott Jewers remained fully engaged with the CRCC and continued to submit evidence. This is explicitly acknowledged in the RCMP's own Final Report:
“On January 4, 2024, you provided additional information to CRCC...” – Page 4
“The investigation was reassigned to Sergeant Allen based on a potential conflict of interest for Sergeant Stevens, as per the above noted CRCC submission...” – Page 4
This proves:
During this same period, Scott Jewers:
At the time, this material was publicly available, clearly cross-referenced, and repeatedly offered. Sergeant Stevens chose to ignore it.
To then state that I refused to cooperate — while omitting all of this — is not just misleading; it is an act of deliberate omission that undermines the integrity of the investigation and the credibility of the RCMP Final Report.
This statement is absolutely false and constitutes defamation.
I have never claimed that:
This is a complete fabrication by the RCMP, and the CRCC must immediately demand that the RCMP produce the source of this statement. If this was included in the investigator’s report without basis or citation, it reflects a severe breach of investigative integrity and intentional defamation of a complainant.
I did speak with Corporal Jessica Welke by phone on May 24, 2023 — however:
This fabrication alone warrants the striking of this RCMP Final Report from the record and a formal investigation into misconduct by the involved parties. CRCC must demand sourcing or retraction, and I am prepared to submit full evidentiary exhibits to support this request.
Response:
At no point did Sergeant Trevor Allen contact me — not once. His complete failure to reach out undermines the integrity of the so-called "reassignment." Or any idea of a thro
Even more concerning, the RCMP explicitly acknowledged a conflict of interest involving Sergeant Jeff Stevens, which triggered the reassignment. If that’s the case, why would Sergeant Allen rely solely on Sergeant Stevens’ narrative without independent verification? That alone indicates investigative negligence — or worse, deliberate misconduct.
In fact, failure to conduct direct contact or independent follow-up in a reassigned case involving a conflict of interest may itself constitute a breach of RCMP investigative protocol — and could rise to the level of professional misconduct under CRCC oversight standards.
Their own report states:
“On January 4, 2024, you provided additional information to CRCC.” – Page 4
That submission directly addressed the conduct of Sergeant Stevens, including his coercive statement to me: “If you don’t meet with me, it never happened.” I was placed in an impossible position, which forced me to escalate to the CRCC — precisely what the process is for.
“Sergeant Allen documented that the information you provided was very repetitive, disjointed, and difficult to follow...” – Page 4
That claim is false, defamatory, and entirely unsupported. At the time, my website — The Wolf and The Neural Network — had over 400 meticulously organized, hyperlinked data points and more than 40 detailed videos. These materials were timestamped, structured, and available for immediate review.
If Sergeant Allen genuinely found the content unclear, why didn’t he cite a single example? He didn’t — because he couldn’t. This wasn’t analysis; it was defamation.
“Between September 10, 2023, and December 13, 2023, there were eight attempts made to meet with you.” – Page 4
Again — this is false. I clearly advised Sergeant Stevens that an in-person meeting was inappropriate, especially without legal counsel. I had already submitted extensive documentation — written statements, videos, and forensic data — all accessible online.
Rather than acknowledge this, the report attempts to discredit my position with selective summaries like:
“You stated you were a Global Technical Expert... alluded to spyware... did not provide any further specifics...”
That is a willful distortion of the facts.
I was not unclear. I was actively trying to report GPS spoofing, unlawful surveillance, evidence tampering, and credible national security threats — all of which are criminal offenses. The issue was not one of communication but one of institutional refusal to investigate.
I provided the literal address. I submitted direct connections, infographics, and detailed reports. Notably, there's no mention at all of www.TheWolfAndTheNeuralNetwork.com, which contains the full contextual evidence.
Even their own internal report shows I followed up the very next day:
“You asked, ‘Who would you call to investigate a criminal investigation?’”
That question precisely highlights what I was doing: seeking accountability through lawful channels. The attempt to downplay or distort this into anything else is not just misleading — it’s yet another example of procedural evasion.
The record as it stands is not just inaccurate — it is institutionally compromised. A full, independent review is now required.
“On Versadex file 2022-154357 on December 20, 2022, Corporal Welke and Constable Chad Sanford went to your house because of a report of emails you sent to Jagmeet Singh and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, among others.” – Page 5
To clarify: no emails were ever sent directly to Jagmeet Singh, Justin Trudeau, or any other official listed. All communications were sent exclusively to the “Main Email Thread”, which included over 77 recipients — many of whom were legal, journalistic, or oversight-related stakeholders. This was a broad multi-party disclosure, not targeted outreach. That distinction is critical: the report misleadingly frames this as direct political correspondence, rather than what it truly was — protected whistleblower-style communication.
It is also important to note that during this same period, the EMIC contracts — originally published through the Government of Canada’s procurement portal — were quietly removed from the public registry: https://search.open.canada.ca/contracts. This deletion occurred between September and November 2022, directly overlapping with the timeline of events I was reporting.
This is not incidental.
The original contract start date — July 5, 2019 — aligns with two key data points:
The removal of federally published contracts, during a period where national security breaches were being actively reported, reinforces the urgent need for independent scrutiny of institutional decision-making, surveillance activities, and transparency failures — particularly at the federal level.
In these very emails — sent to the RCMP and other officials through the Main Email Thread — I directly provided evidence of these missing contracts and explicitly stated they were still accessible via the Wayback Machine. This is not speculative. The RCMP received a copy of this documentation, including screenshots showing both the missing contracts and the public archive reference. How could the RCMP miss this?
👉 Reference Screenshot:
https://tinyurl.com/24y5d68m
(Includes visual proof of the email sent to the Main Email Thread, directed RCMP. It includes screenshots of the missing contracts, and Wayback confirmation.)
Furthermore, the phrase “because of a report of emails” is vague and unsupported by any reference to threat, content, or complainant. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees freedom of expression and freedom of political communication — including the right to contact government. The fact that this generated a law enforcement response without any identified criminal content, while im able to quantify allthis abuse against me is deeply troubling.
“...At that time there was no answer at your home and no communication occurred between you and the officers. The next day, Constable Sanford did speak with you regarding this matter in which you told him your IP address was hacked, and you felt CSIS and RCMP were responsible. You told Constable Sanford you were only sending emails to government officials to get attention as you felt you were being harassed by police and government. You did not elaborate with any details about this harassment. You were cautioned by Constable Sanford about the emails as they could be interpreted as threatening. At the time you requested to speak with the RCMP Commissioner but there was no indication you had any documentation or inquired about making a police report. Your sexual orientation was not discussed...”
This account grossly misrepresents the tone, content, and context of that conversation:
What exactly did they think I was asking Commissioner Lucki for — baking tips?
Summary
This portion of the RCMP record presents an incomplete, misleading, and arguably retaliatory narrative. If RCMP and NSHA officials are capable of perceiving fabricated, baseless "threats" — yet fail to recognize the detailed evidence of institutional abuse included in the same communication threads — the conclusion is simple:
That’s not oversight. That’s fraud.
This misrepresentation violates both factual integrity and professional policing standards. It must be corrected in the official record and formally addressed by the CRCC as part of its investigative mandate.
According to Corporal Joseph Fraser of the Halifax RCMP, Corporal Jessica Welke made the following claims in an internal email regarding this public complaint:
“Corporal Welke stated that when she spoke with you, you expressed concerns about corruption between the provincial government and the Irving oil company. You stated that you were wrongly fired from Irving because you were going to expose the believed corruption. She stated that she did not recall you reporting an assault to her. She stated that she never discussed your sexual orientation with you.”
First. On approx June 24th 2025 i received the RCMP update stating the case would be reassigned to Cpl Joe Fraser for review. That letter is dated June 1st 2025. Showing how quickly they “disposed” of this complaint.
Let me be clear: I was never fired from J.D. Irving.
My formal employment term at Irving Shipbuilding lasted from February 4, 2019, to July 26, 2019. On my final day, I participated in a professional exit meeting with Human Resources. I was not terminated — in fact, I was informed that I had two professional references on file, one from a director and one from a manager.
HR asked offered me whatever i wanted on my last day. I responded that I wasn’t looking for just another job — I was looking for a meaningful follow-up based on the merit. And that something occured.
The issue involving Jim Perrin had nothing to do with my departure from Irving. Rather, it relates to a concerning pattern of behavior and dates that any even slightly competent investigator would flag. Notably, my wallet was stolen on May 27, 2019 — during my employment — and a clear timeline emerges that links Jim Perrin to this event. The connection raises serious questions, especially when viewed through the lens of motive, means, and opportunity.
In addition, from late 2019 through early 2020, I supported a technical investigation at Irving Shipbuilding, which concluded in February 2020. The quality, scope, and rigor of my work during that period were significant. I am fully confident that J.D. Irving, CSIS, DND, and the Government of Canada would attest to the value of my technical, ethical, and security evaluations.
Corporal Welke’s claims are not merely inaccurate — they appear to be deliberate falsifications, clearly intended to distort my statements into a baseless “conspiracy theory” and support a fabricated mental health narrative that she and other officers began crafting as early as August 16, 2022. She knows if she goes backand admist what she did, then its going to be a massive investigation and they were all liable and would have totestify against eachother. She knows she can drive this narrative and preneted to be a victim by using plausible deniability. This was done with the apparent goal of discrediting and delegitimizing a valid, well-documented national security complaint.
Her references to Irving and the alleged “wrongful firing” were entirely manufactured and show a clear consistent and malicious pattern of falsifying records and retaliation. These misrepresentations appear strategically crafted to reframe my disclosures as paranoia or personal grievance — instead of what they were: detailed, technical, and evidence-based warnings of serious institutional vulnerabilities.
Let us also be precise: Jessica Welke had full access to the Main Email Thread, which included:
She was also aware of my professional background, the national security context, and the public interest implications of my disclosures.
And yet — she now claims that during two in-person meetings on March 29, 2023, and April 1, 2023, she had no questions about any of this?
This defies logic.
It is inconsistent with any reasonable investigative standard, particularly in a case involving:
Corporal Jessica Welke:
This behavior is not merely negligent — it is malicious, and it must be treated as such.
Her actions:
This was not a misunderstanding — it was a calculated obstruction of justice.
And it demands immediate accountability.
This statement reveals a critical procedural failure:
• On May 27, 2025, I personally observed a large moving truck clearly labeled “MOVING” parked at the RCMP house in Moser River — which sits directly on the highway between Ecum Secum and Sheet Harbour, where I was driving my uncle for a medical appointment. • This indicates that Corporal Jessica Welke was only contacted by RCMP investigators around or after May 27, 2025, as she was actively relocating and did not have access to her notes. • The public complaint to CRCC was officially opened on March 27, 2023 — over two years earlier. • This confirms that neither Sergeant Jeff Stevens nor Sergeant Trevor Allen contacted Corporal Jessica Welke for over 700 days regarding an active misconduct investigation in which she was a named party and key witness.
This delay is not just negligent — it is procedurally indefensible. For more than two years, no effort was made to clarify statements, verify timelines, or obtain testimony from the central RCMP officer involved. Such a delay suggests either intentional suppression or gross investigative misconduct, both of which undermine the credibility of the RCMP Final Report 2023-521587 and raise serious concerns about the legitimacy of the investigative process itself.
“During the conversation, she said she met with you in person when you came to the Sheet Harbour Detachment. You said you were recently fired and claimed corruption between the large corporation “JD Irving” and the government of Nova Scotia.”
Jessica Welke and I met March 29, 2023, and April 1, 2023. I provided Jessica with a detailed account of the abuse, including Sexual Assault. I advised her again on my GPS being set to 9330 Stillwater NS. I asked her on March 29 to watch a video on EMIC / Cambridge Analytica so she would understand how serious the issue was both politically and socially. I gave Jessica printed material and made clear that everything else was already provided digitally. This was not a new evidence submission — it was to show that she had everything I physically possessed, and I was cooperating fully.
I have never stated that I was fired from JD Irving. That is a direct fabrication. My last day at Irving Shipbuilding was July 26, 2019. I left voluntarily, and before leaving, I spoke with HR, where they confirmed a manager and director reference remained on file. They even offered me "whatever I wanted." Their internal staff noted, "This is one of the smartest people we’ve met." Due to the seriousness of the issues I was facing, I made the choice to step away.
Jim Perrin was sent to conduct an investigation at Irving Shipbuilding in 2019 and 2020. This directly links him to the period when I was employed there, clearly establishing motive, means, and opportunity concerning the theft of my wallet and his potential interests in protecting JDIrving.
Given this context, how could Jessica Welke not know that an investigation had already taken place at Irving Shipbuilding? The answer is simple: she did know — and she deliberately moved to close the record in order to preserve plausible deniability.
“You did not provide any details so she could verify the investigation existed, she had nothing to reference, so she directed you to the neighboring detachment to provide the information. She said she was not aware of your sexual orientation at any time.” – Page 6
This is a false and misleading statement.
On May 24, 2023, my aunt and I called Corporal Jessica Welke directly. The call was recorded in full. In that call: • I explicitly requested that charges be pressed based on ongoing abuse. • There are audible threats in the background during the call. • Jessica Welke herself can be heard saying, “I will call you Monday.” She never did.
Instead, on May 27, 2023, I received a sudden call from the Mobile Mental Health Crisis Team (MMHCT). The call lasted approximately 30 seconds, with no meaningful engagement — it served as a clear psychological threat. The timing and content made it unmistakably retaliatory.
On the evening of that Monday (May 29, 2023), I followed up with the Sheet Harbour RCMP detachment. I spoke to Constable Justin Hall, who informed me that Jessica was “helping with wildfires” and said she would get back to me. She never did.
Then, on July 27, 2023, I personally walked into both the Sheet Harbour and Sherbrooke RCMP detachments wearing a body camera and delivered printed evidence, including: • Proof that my website, TheWolfAndTheNeuralNetwork.com, had been launched • The video documentation of the abuse • Summaries of the investigation • Cross-referenced source materials
This evidence delivery was recorded and published: 👉 YouTube – RCMP Evidence Drop-Off: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9qzi7-6Ag8
Despite all this, the RCMP now claims Jessica Welke had “nothing to reference.” This is demonstrably false. She had email trails, recorded calls, printed materials, and public-facing documentation.
Finally — and critically — at no point have I ever accused Jessica Welke, Justin Hall, or Chad Sanford of making any comment or reference regarding my sexual orientation. That statement in the RCMP report is a complete fabrication, inserted without basis. Its inclusion is not only inappropriate — it is defamatory.
“Regarding the mental health call, she later learned from your brother that you were held/committed for three days and transferred to a facility in Yarmouth, N.S. These actions were conducted by the Medical/Mental Health staff and had nothing to do with the police.” – Page 6
This is false, deliberately vague, and constitutes a clear attempt to distance the RCMP from their direct involvement in a retaliatory psychiatric intervention that took place on March 13, 2023.
On that date, I received a direct phone call from Corporal Jessica Welke. She informed me that I was arrestable under the Involuntary Psychiatric Treatment Act (IPTA). Her exact words included, “I don’t know why they’re making me do this.” She said she had contacted three departments for clarification and was told this order came from a Nova Scotia Health Authority Director — and that she had no choice.
I told her this was happening because she had refused to let me open a case. I said, “They know you’ve done nothing and will do nothing — and now I’m going to be punished for that.” She acknowledged the situation and stated that if I were detained, she would personally drive to the facility to take my statement.
I complied with every request made that day. There are no records of erratic or threatening behavior. Every health professional I encountered noted I was calm, coherent, and cooperative. I have video from the day, family witnesses, and a complete record of transparency.
The RCMP’s claim that they "learned this from your brother" is false. Jessica Welke knew because she was the one who called me. While i had also called her March 14th 2023. She conveyed the directive, expressed her discomfort, and was directly involved in its enforcement. The RCMP’s omission of that fact is deceptive.
This was not a spontaneous mental health referral — it was a cross-institutional act of retaliation, triggered after I made clear I would begin publicly documenting their refusal to investigate serious criminal acts.
“At the time of drafting this report, no written summary was provided from Corporal Welke.” – Page 6
This line, in context, reveals a procedural collapse.
All evidence suggests this report was drafted around May 27, 2025 — the same period Corporal Welke was relocating. Yet, by June 4, 2025, the case was closed by Inspector Cory Bushell without: • A signed statement • A transcript • A source document from the most critical officer in the case
Instead, Bushell closed the case based on a vague phone call, with no documentation to back it up.
This creates a situation where Jessica Welke — a central witness — is now free to reinterpret or deny anything attributed to her.
No chain of custody. No accountability. Just a manufactured narrative used to close a complaint without proper record.
This failure alone renders the RCMP report incomplete, unreliable, and open to manipulation. It confirms the broader concern: this investigation was not conducted in good faith.
On June 4, 2025, I received the following statement from the RCMP:
“Mr. Jewers, I would like to offer a sincere apology for the length of time it took to finalize this public complaint. It is beyond the mandated response time to complete a Public Complaint investigation and to provide a Final Report. We will strive to provide a timelier response in the future.”
This statement is not only disingenuous — it is procedurally and ethically indefensible.
This was not an unfortunate backlog. It was a deliberate two-year obstruction that resulted in the RCMP closing a misconduct investigation:
Let’s be absolutely clear:
The RCMP themselves acknowledged that Sergeant Jeff Stevens had a conflict of interest in this case. Yet:
Despite all of this, the RCMP closed the case — knowing the core witness was never formally interviewed, and the complainant was never consulted.
This was not about delay — it was about institutional preservation. The delay served a function:
This conduct is in direct violation of Section 45.42 of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act, which mandates that public complaint investigations be carried out in good faith and without unreasonable delay. This threshold was not only unmet — it was actively undermined.
To restore even a semblance of public trust, an apology is meaningless unless it is followed by:
This was not administrative failure.
This was state-enabled misconduct — and it demands a legal, not rhetorical, response.
Regarding the abuse that occurred on March 13, 2023:
On October 22, 2022, I submitted a detailed report outlining the false arrest and torture I experienced on August 2, 2022. On April 8, 2023, I submitted another comprehensive report detailing the retaliation and unlawful arrest that occurred on March 13, 2023, involving both NSHA and the RCMP.
Both reports were sent through the same Main Email Thread — the very thread that RCMP and NSHA later referenced when falsely accusing me of making “threats.”
It is therefore indisputable that they had full access to these submissions, each of which clearly documented the abuse and the RCMP’s ongoing refusal to open a formal case.
Their failure to act is not a result of confusion or lack of evidence — it was a deliberate and willful refusal to acknowledge the truth.
October 22nd 2022: HTML - https://tinyurl.com/5chmc7te FULL: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/2022-10-22_October%2022nd%202022%20Detailing%20the%20Illegal%20Arrest%20and%20Captivity%20by%20HRP%20from%20August%202nd%202022.docx
April 8th 2023 – HTML: https://tinyurl.com/5e8axyjf FULL: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/2023-04-08%20-%20April%208th%202023%20-%20NSHA%20Complaint.%20Given%201%20week%20to%20comply.docx
Prior to and on March 13, 2023, I advised on Email Thread i would be going to HRP to file a complaint regarding the abuse by HRP and NSHA August 2nd 2022, and Events that occurred before. But also to drop off evidence at CSIS. I have never in any communication alluded to going to NSHA, or stated i would be going to NSHA. I have never in sent while i have never sent communication directly to any NSHA employee, nor have i ever engaged any NSHA employee directly otherwise. Any and all communication with NSHA was on main Email Thread, accessible to over 77 recipients including law enforcement.
Any claim by NSHA, RCMP is absolutely defamation with malice. Any claim of this is absolutely slanderous, RCMP and NSHA have been asked to produce any statement of such and they cannot. They have also been asked to produce evidence of any threatening emails, they have been unable to produce any examples while they admit there are no examples in any of their notes.
I would advise, i would be carrying my signs “JD IRVING POSTMEDIA HRP FRAMED and TORTURED ME” and on the back “CTV CBC HELPED COVER IT UP”.
I was very clear about where i was going, and why. I had tried repeatedly to file complaint with RCMP, they denied repeatedly. While i can show the massive retaliation when i went to HRP August 2nd 2022.
I carried my sign silently through Halifax. I Engaged with and bothered no one. A few people did stop me to ask, and one even said “Sorry” as i walked past. I went to CSIS, dropped off additional evidence. They had absolutely no problems and accepted the drop off. I then went to HRP. I did not protest, hesitate or cause any issues what so ever. I was at HRP easily half an hour waiting, without any incident. In fact, Dean Simmons came out said hi, then said hi to everyone waiting. I filed my form 5 complaint without any incident. None of these parties reported any incidents. While RCMP were also on the email thread.
Completed Form 5 image (JPEG):
I would then walk down Robie Street, past CTV with my sign and then down Barrington Street past of Irving Shipbuilding. I kept on the opposite side of the road. I did not bother a single person, yell or even speak.
While driving home, I received a call from Jessica Welke. She asked where I was, and I openly told her my location. She informed me that I was “arrestable” under the Involuntary Psychiatric Treatment Act (IPTA) and added, “I don’t know why they’re making me do this.” I responded, “Jessica, it’s because you didn’t do anything — they know that, and now they can retaliate.”. She then told me that if I were admitted, she promised to drive to wherever I was to take a statement. I waited at the Walmart in Cole Harbour until the officers arrived.
I would completely comply with the Officers Their reports, and direct video will show how calm i was the entire time. During the interaction i could see their Screen, it said i was delusional and becoming increasingly delusional. Absolutely very dangerous slander by NSHA. Here are videos showing how, cool, calm and collected i was.
https://youtube.com/shorts/vAGojH4lmi0
https://youtube.com/shorts/YoBWvnIlNpc
https://youtube.com/shorts/-1kKtjV4gII
https://youtube.com/shorts/euGRDp5cHNc
https://youtube.com/shorts/PoiP1DXvhJI
Every single officer — including those involved in the HRP review of the August 2, 2022 video, as well as the RCMP officers who later attended my residence — consistently noted how calm, composed, and cooperative I was throughout each interaction. Not once did they receive any complaints from my family or anyone else. At no point did I cause any issues with law enforcement. In fact, the records show that I clearly stated it was inappropriate for others to drag the officers into this situation.
This makes the subsequent abuse by both the RCMP and HRP all the more obscene. I had no prior issues with police, no record of misconduct — nothing that would justify the treatment I received.
At the QEII Emergency Department, I was transferred into the custody of a male and female officer. According to Inspector Cory Bushell’s notes on page 5 of the RCMP Final Report, this is when Halifax Regional Police member Constable Brenda Smith assumed custody:
“...He transported you to the Queen Elizabeth II hospital in Halifax, where Constable Brenda Smith took over custody of you until you were assessed by a physician...”
While Constable Smith is named, the male officer who remained with me during the wait is not identified in the report and is never mentioned. I waited calmly in the hallway with him until I was eventually taken into a room by a young male NSHA staff member.
I requested access to legal counsel but was denied and told I had to speak with staff immediately. I explained that, if I was being compelled to talk, everything I said would be fact-based and supported by evidence. I outlined my professional background, disclosed potential biases, and summarized key evidence, including:
Part-way through, the interviewer asked, “You’re not recording this, are you?”
I answered, “Maybe.” He paused, said he needed to speak with someone, and ended the interview.
I was then returned to the hallway, where the same male and female officers remained with me.
While seated in the hallway — in full view of the attending officers and nearby patients — I was approached by two NSHA staff members. One of them, as per NSHA record appears to be Hana Marie Weimer. The other female employee was not named.
They informed me that I was not permitted to make an audio recording. I calmly responded that, under Canadian law, I was within my rights to record one-on-one interactions under the one-party consent rule. I acknowledged that recording in common areas could present issues, but reiterated that recording private conversations — especially those related to my care or legal matters — is entirely lawful.
I explicitly asked them to provide the hospital’s policy on patient recordings. They refused. I asked again, and they again denied my request. I then asked for access to legal policy, which was also denied.
Their justification was that the recording would infringe on “their privacy.” However, under Canadian medical law and CMPA guidance, patients are permitted to record clinical encounters without the physician’s consent. It is physicians, not patients, who are required to obtain recorded or documented consent:
"Although patients can record their clinical encounters without a physician’s consent, the same does not hold true for physicians. Clinicians who wish to record a clinical encounter should first obtain informed consent from the patient, and that consent discussion should be noted in the medical record."
— Canadian Medical Protective Association (CMPA)
Source
Despite this, Hana Marie Weimer failed to document any discussion of consent or recording in the medical record — itself a procedural and ethical violation.
While waiting with the male officer, I began speaking with him informally about what had occurred. I explained parts of the situation and shared some of the supporting evidence. At one point, he asked, “Why are you so sure they’re going to lock you up?” I responded, “Because they’re facing multi-million dollar litigation, and acknowledging what happened would require filing complaints against their own directors.”
I then showed him some of the evidence I had compiled on my smartphone. He responded appropriately — acknowledging that what I showed him was extremely compelling, while also noting that he couldn’t independently verify it. I agreed, telling him something like “That’s exactly the right approach — stay critical. But you can clearly see this is something the police should be investigating. And what I’ve shown you is only about five percent of the full record.”
After hours of waiting, I was taken into a room with Hana Marie Weimer. Once again, I asked for access to legal counsel — and was denied.
Given the seriousness of the allegations against NSHA, the fact that I had just filed a formal complaint with Halifax Regional Police, and that I was now being denied legal representation, I requested permission to audio record the interaction to ensure there was an objective record. Hana Marie Weimer refused and warned that if I attempted to record, security would physically remove my phone.
She then stated that if I did not speak with her, I would simply be admitted. I responded by clearly stating that, under the Involuntary Psychiatric Treatment Act (IPTA), any admission must be based on facts and evidence. I then outlined my technical background, disclosed any relevant bias, and explained that I aimed for at least 70% accuracy in all claims. I described The Wolf and the Neural Network – ALPHA, a research project consisting of over 400 hyperlinked, chronologically ordered, and cross-referenced data points supporting my complaint.
I informed her of serious instances of abuse by NSHA, including the falsification of records, the mishandling of my bookbag, and a documented sexual assault. I also told her about my phone’s GPS being set without my consent to 9330 Highway #7, about Premier Tim Houston arriving the morning my mother died, and the Valent Legal domain hack.
At that point, she interrupted me and said, “Okay, obviously you’re making this all up.” I remained calm and replied, “Hana, I understand this may sound complex. I'm a technical expert — is there a specific part you’d like me to clarify?” She said “I don’t know”.
Hana Marie Weimer then stated she was going to seek a second opinion. She left the room, taking her clearly biased and fabricated assessment to another staff member. During this time, the male officer entered the room again. We spoke briefly, and when Hana Marie Weimer returned, I asked the officer to remain present for what she was about to say.
She then announced, “We’re admitting you.”
I looked at the officer, laughed, and said, “I told you so.” He immediately turned to Hana Marie Weimer and said, “I need to speak with you outside.”
At that moment, it was obvious to anyone paying attention what was really happening. This wasn’t a legitimate medical assessment — it was an exercise of institutional power, where facts and evidence were deliberately disregarded. Hana Marie Weimer knew she had made serious mistakes. She was fully aware that I had requested legal representation and that this would end up in court. The more she omitted from the record — or framed it through her own bias and plausible deniability — the better positioned she believed she’d be to shield herself from accountability in future legal proceedings.
I was then forced to remain in a room under constant surveillance, with two cameras recording for nearly 24 hours. This room was openly accessible — anyone from the hospital’s secondary waiting area or nearby corridors could enter. There was no privacy, no medical justification for the prolonged detainment in that setting, and no protection of patient dignity. I documented these conditions, including my verbal commentary on the cameras and a visual tour of the room, in this video:
📹 https://youtube.com/shorts/PoiP1DXvhJI
Over the course of that 24-hour period, a woman came to speak with me about supposedly “protesting” on August 2, 2022. I clearly explained — once again — that no protest ever occurred. I had gone to HRP that day to file a formal complaint and to inquire about the FOI request regarding my missing wallet. HRP had previously stated that the wallet was part of something “ongoing,” so I returned to seek clarification.
Later, I called Corporal Jessica Welke at the RCMP detachment in Sheet Harbour and informed her that I had just been admitted. I asked for her help and once again shared critical details — including evidence of abuse, my phone’s GPS being set without consent to 9330 Highway #7, and the fact that Premier Tim Houston showed up the morning my mother passed away. I reminded her of the disturbing anonymous rape calls we had received and made clear that what was happening was a direct act of retaliation for reporting serious institutional abuse by the NSHA.
In the evening, two family members would show up. NSHA would not initially let them see me and would claim that i checked myself in. When they came to see me immediately commented, unprompted about the cameras recording, they refused to close the door out of concern. Through the window, into the second room beside the one we were in. A man would come and stand in the room, again, family made immediate comments. Then during very bad snowy conditions, immediately after i was transferred to Yarmouth NS. Which is 12 Hour round trip away from Friends, Family and Support. Here my phone was removed, i was forced drugs and had to wash my underwear and clothing in the sink.
During this encounter:
From that point forward, the record was irreparably compromised. I was forced under duress and the threat of physical removal, confinement, drugging, and involuntary psychiatric detention. The file contains:
I informed Hana Marie Weimer that, if I was being forced to speak, the Involuntary Psychiatric Treatment Act (IPTA) requires that all admissions be based on facts and evidence. I explained my background, professional experience, documented methodology, and the purpose of The Wolf and The Neural Network (TWNN). I explicity that my bias and said i aimed for 70% on each topic. I described my “1% approach,” outlined the top-level evidence in my possession, and asked: If not the police, who should I report this to?
“...On Versadex file 2023-30145 on March 13, 2023, the Mobile Mental Health Crisis Line requested
a mental health wellness check on you at your home. Based on this request, Corporal Welke
called you over the telephone and explained about the request they received at Sheet Harbour
RCMP. You told Corporal Welke that you were at the Walmart parking lot in Cole Harbour, Nova
Scotia. Corporal Welke passed this information along to the police dispatcher. The Mobile Mental
Health Crisis Team (MMHCT) member, Constable Brenda Smith (a Halifax Regional Police
member), noted in her “supplemental report” on the file that you had been sending emails of a
threatening nature to multiple people within the Health Authority. You indicated you planned to
visit different corporations this date, which caused concerns for the safety of people at those
locations. The clinicians were advised to locate you and bring you to the hospital. One of the
email recipients was a psychiatrist who indicated you could be psychotic. The initial request was
for a well-being check only. That changed when direction from mental health professionals came
forward. Constable Geoff Matthews of Cole Harbour RCMP arrived at your location and
understood grounds already existed for your apprehension under the Involuntary Psychiatric
Treatment Act (IPTA) by the MMHCT. He was there to assist MMHCT to escort you for that reason
and you cooperated and consented to going to the hospital. He transported you to the Queen
Elizabeth II hospital in Halifax, where Constable Brenda Smith took over custody of you until you
were assessed by a physician. Corporal Welke had no further involvement at this time and did
not discuss your sexual orientation during her interaction with you...” – Page 5.RCMP Final Report, June 4th 2025.
Chief Complaint
BIZZARE / PARANOID BEHAVIOUR
Triage Notes
PT HERE UNDER SECTION 14 WITH MOBILE CRISIS TEAM. PT HAS BEEN SENDING VAGUE THREATENING EMAILS TO GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AND NSHA EMPLOYEES WITH SOME THREATS TO DOCTORS. DENIES S/H/I AT PRESENT. CALM AND COOPERATIVE IN TRIAGE. GOOD EYE CONTACT. GOOD AFFECT. CUFFED AT PRESENT. PMHX - DELUSIONAL DISORDER
Triage Time: 16:59
Triaged By: AG
Time to RM: 17:15
MD Time: 17:30
Medications: NILx Stopped risperidone sept 2022
Attending Physician (Print): Weimer
35M – brought in
by Mobile Crisis
At HRP Hfx today with PMHx psychosis? delusional
Concerns about stolen wallet
(1.2019?) + stated gov involved
(Stephen McNeil [his brother?]) as
well as Daniel Kinsella, HRP Chief.
Has Filed several complaints, also
against NSH. Feels specific dates
are significant, esp personally.
<Unclear text from image>@ sleep / appetite: preoccupation w/ → assistance???</Unclear text from image>
o/e) <unknown text> noted alert calm
<unknown text>
good eye contact. SI – pressured speech
(flight of ideas, grandiose ideation + paranoid)
NO->SI, NO-> HI, NO-> AH/VH
A/P) psychosis vs. manic episode
X: Psychosis NOS
<Notes on the right>
PHMX: Psychosis -> Delusional PIO <unclear text>
A) Aug 2022 related to paid work <unclear text> at JDIrving on Social Assitance.
Smoker Cannabis-OCC ETOH rare <unlcear text>
Mother died → 2 months ago
Lives Alone
It is now clear that this event was later used as a stepping stone to justify NSHA’s August 31, 2023 retaliation, when I was falsely accused of trespassing and served by a bailiff. All three copies of the form were signed by the same individual, who also completed the witness section—a fraudulent act designed to give the appearance of legal legitimacy.
NSHA’s claim that I was physically present on August 22, 2023, amounts to identity theft, as it falsely asserted I was present at a location I had never visited. This necessarily involved the use or inference of my Personal Health Information (PHI)—a direct violation of PIPEDA and PHIA. Given that my wallet and identity were stolen under NSHA’s care on August 2–3, 2022, it is now entirely reasonable to question how they can confirm the identity of the individual they claim was present. This shows a sustained pattern of retaliation, fraud, and breach of legal and ethical duty.
This incident represents a severe abuse of psychiatric authority, a targeted act of retaliation, and a direct violation of privacy, civil, and constitutional rights. It was a deliberate attempt to erase legal evidence of criminal conduct reported against NSHA.
This event meets the threshold for a Real Risk of Significant Harm (RROSH) under PIPEDA, and constitutes a breach of:
This coordinated pattern of fraud, misrepresentation, and defamation — committed by NSHA (particularly Hana Marie Weimer) and RCMP — demonstrates a systemic effort to suppress lawful whistleblowing, obstruct justice, and protect institutional actors from accountability. The deliberate manipulation of medical and legal records in this case constitutes a clear violation of legal, ethical, and constitutional standards.
Hana Marie Weimer deliberately omitted key facts from the medical record — including my explicit requests for legal counsel and to audio record the interaction. Under Canadian law, patients are permitted to record medical encounters under one-party consent, and physicians are legally required to document consent-related discussions in the patient’s chart. She did neither.
Her refusal to allow recording — despite being informed of serious institutional abuse and legal proceedings — was not for privacy or safety. It was to manipulate the official record, exclude exculpatory context, and frame me as unstable by removing any trace of my calm, rational, and rights-based approach.
She further:
These omissions were not clerical. They were deliberate falsifications to:
Given the totality of the record, video evidence, and surrounding context, it is clear that Hana Marie Weimer acted with intent to defraud, suppress evidence, and inflict reputational and psychological harm as part of a broader institutional cover-up.
This “Investigation” Was Not Done in Good Faith, and Is Wrought With Malice
Despite RCMP claims of a “thorough investigation” conducted by Sergeant Trevor Allen — described as “an experienced investigator” — the facts reveal a very different reality. What occurred here was not an investigation. It was a deliberate, prolonged act of institutional negligence, retaliation, and reputational defamation.
The file was reassigned to Sergeant Allen due to a formally acknowledged conflict of interest involving Sergeant Jeff Stevens (per CRCC, January 4, 2024).
However, Sergeant Allen never once contacted me. No phone call. No email. No interview. No request for clarification.
Instead, Allen’s entire “investigation” was based on second-hand summaries from the very officer who was deemed conflicted — Sergeant Stevens — which undermines the legitimacy of the reassignment itself.
Allen claimed my submissions were “repetitive, disjointed, and difficult to follow” — but provided no examples, no quotes, and no evidence to support this assertion.
In fact, at the time of this investigation, www.TheWolfAndTheNeuralNetwork.com hosted over 600 hyperlinked data points, dozens of videos, and a fully accessible public record — all structured, timestamped, and submitted publicly. While as of December 2024, there were over 900 data points.
The RCMP’s inability — or refusal — to cite even one specific entry proves that these statements were not objective findings, but biased attempts to discredit the complainant.
The complaint was filed on March 27, 2023. The RCMP’s Final Report is dated June 4, 2025 — around 800 days later.
And yet, the central officer under investigation — Corporal Jessica Welke — was not contacted until approximately May 27, 2025, during her physical relocation out of the Sheet Harbour detachment.
That’s a delay of nearly 790 days before first contact with the subject officer in a public complaint process.
At the time of contact, Welke did not have access to her notes, and as RCMP themselves admit:
“No written summary was provided from Corporal Welke.”
This means the entire conclusion of the report rests on hearsay, collected via an undocumented phone call, with no transcript, no signature, and no legal admissibility. The RCMP then proceeded to close the file within days.
That is not due process. That is manufactured closure — designed to neutralize liability and discredit the complainant before a full evidentiary review could take place.
This is not an oversight. It is deliberate dereliction of duty, and a direct violation of Section 45.42 of the RCMP Act, which mandates timely and good-faith investigations of public complaints.
RCMP claim I sent “threatening” emails to individuals — yet provide no quotes, no complainants, and no examples.
In fact, all emails were submitted through a multi-party Main Email Thread, which RCMP acknowledged having access to as early as September 17, 2021. They specifically stated they didn’t need to be added — they could already “see it.”
The assertion that I was sending individualized threats is factually false, intellectually dishonest, and legally dangerous. It weaponizes innuendo to deflect from the real issue: their refusal to act on credible evidence.
This was not a procedural delay.
This was a coordinated institutional cover-up — executed through:
The RCMP did not investigate my complaint.
They erased it — then constructed a false narrative to justify that erasure.
The RCMP is fully aware that had they acknowledged the evidence or opened a legitimate case, they would be admitting that my arrest by Halifax Regional Police on August 2, 2022, was unlawful. They would be forced to concede that the evidence was always there — that I am, and have always been, a credible witness to serious institutional abuse, including torture, medical retaliation, record tampering, and sexual assault committed by NSHA staff. How can the RCMP claim I made threats when they provide no examples whatsoever — while I continue to submit extensive technical evidence, detailed documentation, and legal analysis? How can RCMP, NSHA, or their representatives claim I’m a threat, yet ignore all of the corroborating data, including the October 2022 report sent to the same email thread highlighting the deletion of EMIC contract records from the government’s own website? How could RCMP and CSIS not see that? The answer is — they did. And instead of acting, they allowed or encouraged officers to retaliate with bias and prejudice in order to manufacture a false record against me. Because acknowledging the truth would have forced those officers to testify or admit wrongdoing. These institutions used, abused, and ultimately discarded their own officers — and those officers responded exactly as expected: with bigotry, fraud, and retaliation. All parties are equally responsible.
Yet Inspector Cory Bushell claimed:
“A thorough investigation has been conducted into your allegations by Sergeant Trevor Allen, who is an experienced investigator.”
This claim falls apart under the most basic scrutiny.
The Civilian Review and Complaints Commission (CRCC) — specifically Paul, a manager not even assigned to investigate — reviewed the same general material and produced five pages of substantive questions. Yet Sergeant Trevor Allen and Inspector Cory Bushell did not ask a single question. Nor did Jessica Welke, or any other Officer.
That contrast alone exposes the RCMP’s intent: evasion, not investigation.
In parallel, I repeatedly submitted detailed evidence — publicly and privately — to RCMP Special Victims Unit officers Shelly Mews and Curt Wallace under case number 2025-21595. This included a May 3, 2025 call, posted openly across Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter.
So how could Inspector Bushell and Sergeant Allen claim there was “no evidence” — when both Constable Mews and Constable Wallace received it directly? How did the CRCC fail to add this evidence to the case or even acknowledge the sexual assault, despite my documented conversations with Paul at the CRCC before and after October 30th 2025? I made it explicitly clear to Paul that it was deeply inappropriate for David, another CRCC staff member, to omit the sexual assault from the record — and yet Paul followed the same path. These omissions are not just procedural failures — they represent a pattern of willful neglect, deliberate suppression of evidence, and institutional misconduct at the highest levels.
The conclusion is simple: CRCC, Bushell and Allen fabricated the record.
In terms of national security, all of this unfolded while CSIS actively monitored the case under Attachment5566. Key officials — including RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme, Premier Tim Houston, and Chief Dennis Daley — were included in the same communication threads and had full access to the submitted evidence.
And yet:
either failed to report these serious national security breaches, or they did report them and then suppressed or omitted critical documentation. A third possibility is that they reported the breaches but deliberately downplayed their severity in this response — despite knowing full well how serious the matter was.
Any of these scenarios represents a profound breach of duty, and raises serious questions about institutional integrity, accountability, and the deliberate obstruction of justice within law enforcement and oversight bodies.
What does this mean?
It means they watched each other lie. CSIS, RCMP, CRCC, NSHA, RCMP and Media. While i have receipts.
And CSIS is fully aware — at least a dozen RCMP officers are implicated in perjury and felony-level misconduct.
🚨 Required Action
The conduct of Sergeant Trevor Allen, Inspector Cory Bushell, and Ignatius Hall reflects not merely administrative failure — but intentional obstruction aimed at protecting internal misconduct and silencing legitimate reporting.
This fabricated record can now be weaponized against me by Shelly Mews and Curt Wallace of the Special Victims Unit — under the false assumption that "these officers would never lie." That assumption is the very bias and prejudice Bushell and Allen counted on. These individuals abused their authority. Their actions are not mistakes — they are criminal.
This Final Report must be struck from the record.
An independent investigation, fully external to the RCMP, must be launched immediately. This includes:
This was never a genuine complaint response.
This was state-enabled gaslighting — and it will not stand uncontested.
Royal Canadian Gendarmerie Royale
Mounted Police du Canada
Inspector Cory Bushell CRCC File # - CCETP no de
Operations Officer - East référence
Halifax Regional RCMP Detachment
1171 Cole Harbour Road, Cole Harbour, 2023-1031
Nova Scotia B2V 1E8
Our File # - Notre référence
2023-521587
Scott Jewers Date:
June 4, 2025
RE: Public Complaint — Part Vil of the RCMP Act
Scott Jewers vs. Corporal Jessica Welke
Dear Mr. Jewers,
This letter is about your concern as expressed to the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission
for the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (CRCC) on March 27, 2023. It refers to allegations against
Corporal Jessica Welke of Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) Sheet Harbour Detachment.
This letter will constitute a final report as required by section 45.64 of the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police Act.
A thorough investigation has been conducted into your allegations by Sergeant Trevor Allen, who
is an experienced investigator. | have had an opportunity to review the investigator's report and,
accordingly, | am now able to comment on your concerns.
A. Background Information
On March 13, 2023, you were apprehended under the Nova Scotia Involuntary Psychiatric
Treatment Act. You believed that various police in Nova Scotia and the Nova Scotia Health
Authority were involved in a coverup regarding your apprehension. Based on this cover up, RCMP
in Sheet Harbour were stalking you based on your sexual orientation, were committing hate
crimes against you, were discriminating against you and thus violating your Charter rights.
Further you stated that the RCMP and Corporal Jessica Welke failed to investigate crimes you
reported or to follow up with you.
Page | |
================================================================================
It was these incidents and the actions of Corporal Jessica Welke which prompted you to lodge
your complaint with CRCC.
B. Nature of Your Complaint
You have alleged the following concerns with regards to Corporal Jessica Welke of the Sheet
Harbour Detachment Royal Canadian Mounted Police:
Allegation #1: Neglect of Duty — That Corporal Welke neglected her duties by failing to
investigate your complaints and failing to follow up with you.
Allegation #2: Bias — Sexual Orientation — That Corporal Welke discriminated against you based
on your sexual orientation.
C. Findings of the Investigation
During the course of this investigation, the following sources of information and materials were
reviewed and relied upon: the investigative report of Sergeant Trevor Allen, your submissions to
the CRCC from March 27, 2023 to April 3, 2024, the file related to your public complaint Police
Reporting and Occurrence System (PROS) file # 2023-521587 and Versadex (an electronic police
records management system) # 2023-47179; PROS file # 2022-1667258; Versadex file # 2022-
154357; Versadex file # 2023-30145; applicable legislation; RCMP policy and procedures.
This public complaint investigation was originally assigned to Sergeant Jeff Stevens who
conducted several investigative steps. In May 2024, your investigation was reassigned to
Sergeant Trevor Allen. In his police report Sergeant Stevens documented several attempts to
meet with you for this investigation. You declined to meet him and stated you did not trust the
police. Due to this, the investigator was unable to verify what allegations you wished to be
investigated or have you sign the public complaint form (4110e). Sergeant Allen reviewed the
correspondence you provided to CRCC and identified the above noted neglect of duty and bias
allegations against Corporal Jessica Welke.
As per the RCMP Act the officer is under no obligation to provide statements for public
complaints. Corporal Welke did not provide a statement; however, she acknowledged this public
complaint and responded to questions asked of her by investigators regarding her interaction
with you.
Allegation #1: Neglect of Duty — That Corporal Welke neglected her duties by failing to
investigate your complaints and failing to follow up with you.
Allegation #2: Bias — Sexual Orientation — That Corporal Welke discriminated against you based
on your sexual orientation.
As allegations 1 and 2 are related to the same incident, | will address them at the same time.
In your submission to the CRCC on March 27, 2023, you stated that Halifax Regional Police (HRP)
lied, and had you falsely arrested because they knew their Chief (of police) was implicated.
Page | 2
================================================================================
Further, the Nova Scotia Health Authority (NSHA) knew they made a mistake and tried to cover
it all up. You further stated that since the RCMP knows you are right, they keep claiming that
because NSHA claims you have a mental health disorder, you do not have any rights. You stated
that you are reporting serious and quantified federal crimes. You stated that the evidence is
compelling, and the technical documents and proof are non-contestable.
You provided extensive written documentation describing how officers did not do their jobs
properly, how leadership has lied about this and sent officers (to you) hoping they would act on
their prejudice and bias. You mentioned your sexual orientation, racism, and mental illness
among other things.
In a follow up phone call with the CRCC, you stated RCMP came to your home because of a
request from NSHA due to your communications through emails with NSHA, RCMP, Halifax
Regional Police (HRP), Members of Parliament, and news outlets. You claimed neglect of duty on
the part of RCMP resulted from the NSHA request for wellness checks and for not accepting your
evidence you wished to provide to the police. You mentioned the names or ranks of members of
both Sheet Harbour and Sherbrooke detachments (RCMP). You mentioned that you were
apprehended under the Involuntary Psychiatric Treatment Act (IPTA) by HRP and transported to
hospital in August 2022. You stated that this public complaint is meant to address allegations of
misconduct by RCMP members. You stated that a male and a female RCMP officer went to your
home after you were released from hospital. You tried to explain your evidence to the officers,
but they dismissed it and left, taking no further action.
You stated on March 13, 2023, you opted to go to HRP office and file a police report to the CSIS
office and drop off your evidence. After you left, you received a call from female officer “Jessica”
(now identified as Corporal Jessica Welke) of Sheet Harbour asking where you were. Shortly after,
you were apprehended in Dartmouth.
You stated that in December 2022, two male RCMP officers came to see you about email
communications which you had sent to “a number of entities”. You tried to make complaints
about crimes against you, but the officers did not have answers for you.
You told the Commission that you made several attempts since September 2021 to provide the
police with evidence that you were a target of harassment and criminal wrongdoings which
coincide with outside events involving political and media entities. You claimed police have no
reason to respond to (Nova Scotia Health Authority) NSHA’s requests and RCMP failed to take
your evidence, open a file, or provide you with guidance on where to direct your concerns.
You submitted additional complaints/material to CRCC on five occasions over the next 13
months, via email and voicemail, totaling twenty-seven pages of narrative, links to websites,
attachments, and other information.
In your correspondence to CRCC, you stated that there is evidence that “Jessica” said she would
contact you, but she lied. You stated that she told you she did nothing about multiple reported
crimes, and that she blamed you. You further stated that on May 24, 2023, you said you received
a call from Corporal Welke (Jessica) who told you that if you ever mention JD Irving, they would
have you arrested and drugged. You claimed this matched her past actions of calling you
Page | 3
================================================================================
“retarded”, and another officer had to stop her from using that language.
On January 4, 2024, you provided additional information to CRCC. This was a result of the original
investigator, Sergeant Stevens, reaching out to you to attend Musquodoboit Detachment (RCMP)
to confirm the allegations and provide a statement. You wrote that children and a disabled
woman were threatened. You wrote that you had directed and recorded threats from police
when the officer told you to attend Musquodoboit Harbour Detachment to proceed with your
investigation. You stated that you do not trust that officer since you were threatened, terrorized,
and falsely arrested by police. You told the CRCC you were frustrated that the public complaint
investigator is only able to investigate the RCMP members' misconduct and not the incident itself
that he reported. You stated that you have reached out to the police 15 times to have the initial
incident investigated but no members will investigate.
The investigation was reassigned to Sergeant Allen based on a potential conflict of interest for
Sergeant Stevens, as per the above noted CRCC submission on January 4, 2024. In his report,
Sergeant Allen documented that you refused to meet with Sergeant Stevens, stating that you lost
trust in the police. Several attempts were made to meet with you to acknowledge the public
complaint and provide a detailed statement. Sergeant Allen documented that the information
you provided was very repetitive, disjointed, and difficult to follow. He wrote that your
information, in many cases, was missing critical details required to establish to whom the
complaint is specifically directed, and what the actual allegations entail. He wrote that you
expressed allegations and concerns toward numerous agencies including the RCMP, The Nova
Scotia Health Authority, Halifax Regional Police, Members of Parliament including the sitting
Prime Minister, J.D. Irving, along with news and media outlets. Sergeant Allen documented that
Corporal Welke, and her neglect of duty appeared to be at the heart of your complaint.
In his report, Sergeant Allen documented all the attempts made by Sergeant Stevens to meet
with you. Between September 10, 2023, and December 13, 2023, there were eight attempts
made to meet with you. Sergeant Stevens spoke with you on September 27, 2023, when you
agreed to meet him at Musquodoboit Harbour RCMP on October 7, 2023. You did not attend for
your appointment and did not answer your phone for Sergeant Stevens. Further attempts were
made and messages left which went unanswered.
On December 12, 2023, you returned a phone call to Sergeant Stevens and said you were not
willing to provide a statement in relation to your complaint as you have lost trust in the police.
You stated you were a Global Technical Expert and spoke about your phone’s GPS location being
changed. You alluded to spyware being placed on your phone and that you brought this up to the
Sheet Harbour RCMP who failed to open a case. During this call, you did not provide any further
specifics related to the events you were reporting despite Sergeant Stevens’ efforts to gather
additional information to proceed with the investigation. Sergeant Stevens received another call
from you on December 13, 2023, and you asked, “who would you call to investigate a criminal
investigation?”. You did not elaborate on what investigation you were referring to. Sergeant
Stevens told you police would be your first call with criminal matters. You advised at this time
that a resolution to your public complaint would involve Assistant Commissioner Dennis Daley
(Commanding Officer for Nova Scotia RCMP), Commissioner Mike Duheme (RCMP
Commissioner) and Corporal Jessica Welke resigning.
Page| 4
================================================================================
Sergeant Allen located twenty-four police files on Versadex involving you under the names Scott
Jewers and Richard Scott Jewers. Among these files, there were only two in Sheet Harbour
(RCMP) that document direct involvement between Corporal Welke and you. These files are
highlighted below:
On Versadex file 2022-154357 on December 20, 2022, Corporal Welke and Constable Chad
Sanford went to your house because of a report of emails you sent to Jagmeet Singh and Prime
Minister Justin Trudeau, among others. At that time there was no answer at your home and no
communication occurred between you and the officers. The next day, Constable Sanford did
speak with you regarding this matter in which you told him your IP address was hacked, and you
felt CSIS and RCMP were responsible. You told Constable Sanford you were only sending emails
to government officials to get attention as you felt you were being harassed by police and
government. You did not elaborate with any details about this harassment. You were cautioned
by Constable Sanford about the emails as they could be interpreted as threatening. At the time
you requested to speak with the RCMP Commissioner but there was no indication you had any
documentation or inquired about making a police report. Your sexual orientation was not
discussed.
On Versadex file 2023-30145 on March 13, 2023, the Mobile Mental Health Crisis Line requested
a mental health wellness check on you at your home. Based on this request, Corporal Welke
called you over the telephone and explained about the request they received at Sheet Harbour
RCMP. You told Corporal Welke that you were at the Walmart parking lot in Cole Harbour, Nova
Scotia. Corporal Welke passed this information along to the police dispatcher. The Mobile Mental
Health Crisis Team (MMHCT) member, Constable Brenda Smith (a Halifax Regional Police
member), noted in her “supplemental report” on the file that you had been sending emails of a
threatening nature to multiple people within the Health Authority. You indicated you planned to
visit different corporations this date, which caused concerns for the safety of people at those
locations. The clinicians were advised to locate you and bring you to the hospital. One of the
email recipients was a psychiatrist who indicated you could be psychotic. The initial request was
for a well-being check only. That changed when direction from mental health professionals came
forward. Constable Geoff Matthews of Cole Harbour RCMP arrived at your location and
understood grounds already existed for your apprehension under the Involuntary Psychiatric
Treatment Act (IPTA) by the MMHCT. He was there to assist MMHCT to escort you for that reason
and you cooperated and consented to going to the hospital. He transported you to the Queen
Elizabeth II hospital in Halifax, where Constable Brenda Smith took over custody of you until you
were assessed by a physician. Corporal Welke had no further involvement at this time and did
not discuss your sexual orientation during her interaction with you.
Corporal Joseph Fraser, Public Complaints Coordinator, of the Halifax Regional RCMP
Detachment exchanged emails with Corporal Welke regarding this public complaint. Corporal
Welke stated that when she spoke with you, you expressed concerns about corruption between
the provincial government and the Irving oil company. You stated that you were wrongly fired
from Irving because you were going to expose the believed corruption. She stated that she did
not recall you reporting an assault to her. She stated that she never discussed your sexual
orientation with you.
Ignatius Hall, an investigator within the Nova Scotia Professional Responsibility Unit spoke with
Page | 5
================================================================================
Corporal Welke by telephone to obtain further contextual information regarding this public
complaint. At this time, Corporal Welke was in transition and relocating/transferring out of Sheet
Harbour Detachment and did not have her notes with her at the time of this conversation (to
confirm dates/times).
During the conversation, she said she met with you in person when you came to the Sheet
Harbour Detachment. You said you were recently fired and claimed corruption between the large
corporation “JD Irving” and the government of Nova Scotia. You did not provide any clarity
around what this “corruption” entailed. You did mention that somebody was assaulted in
another jurisdiction, and you wanted to pass along information. You did not provide any details
so she could verify the investigation existed, she had nothing to reference, so she directed you
to the neighboring detachment to provide the information. She said she was not aware of your
sexual orientation at any time. Your race was never discussed. Regarding her following up with
you, she told you, due to the confusion over the nature of your complaint (against the
government and JD Irving), she was not sure where this information would be directed. You did
not make a specific criminal allegation. Unfortunately, she had no documented follow-up with
you from that point and she could not recall whether she spoke with you again on this matter.
She did say that since your complaint was still unclear, she would not be able to provide you with
any update regardless. Regarding the mental health call, she later learned from your brother that
you were held/committed for three days and transferred to a facility in Yarmouth, N.S. These
actions were conducted by the Medical/Mental Health staff and had nothing to do with the
police. She said she would never use the word “retarded” and did not say she would have you
“arrested and drugged if you mentioned JD Irving again.” Mr. Hall requested a written summary
of these responses from Corporal Welke. She indicated she would attempt to do so once she
gathered her notes in Sheet Harbour. At the time of drafting this report, no written summary was
provided from Corporal Welke.
For further clarity, based on the complaint from the Mental Health Crisis Line, the officer
responding had authority to detain you based on the following sections of the Nova Scotia
Involuntary Psychiatric Treatment Act.
Powers of peace officer:
14. A peace officer may take a person into custody and take the person forthwith to a
place for a medical examination by a physician if the peace officer has reasonable and
probable grounds to believe that
(a) the person apparently has a mental disorder;
(b) the person will not consent to undergo medical examination;
(c) it is not feasible in the circumstances to make application to a judge for an order
for a medical examination pursuant to Section 13; and
(d) the person, ...(ii) as a result of the mental disorder, is likely to suffer serious
physical impairment or serious mental deterioration, or both, or (iii) is committing
or about to commit a criminal offence.
Medical examination:
16 (1) A peace officer or other authorized individual who takes a person into custody fora
Page | 6
================================================================================
medical examination shall convey the person by the least intrusive means possible without
compromising the safety of the person.
(2) The peace officer or other authorized individual shall remain at the place of the medical
examination and shall retain custody of the person until the medical examination is
completed.
As stated above, the officer who escorted you did so on behalf of the MMHCT member, Constable
Smith, who is not an RCMP officer and therefore does not fall under the RCMP Act.
Regarding Allegation #1, after reviewing all the information and evidence available to me, |
cannot support your allegation. You suggested that Corporal Welke was negligent in conducting
investigations of crimes against you, however the evidence shows you had not provided
information or evidence of any crime. The information you provided to the CRCC is lengthy;
however, it is lacking in specifics regarding dates or a time range, names of involved RCMP police
officer or other police officers, and there is no discernable allegation. Attempts to clarify this
information with you have gone unanswered and therefore you have circumvented any
possibility for further investigation. | could find no records to corroborate that you made fifteen
complaints that were not investigated by police. There were 24 reported police files in which you
were involved, however none of these files included the conspiracy information which you had
provided to the CRCC. In the documented police files in which you and Corporal Welke have
interaction, | find that she did have contact with you during a telephone conversation on March
13, 2023. In this conversation, she told you that the Mobile Mental Health Line requested a
welfare check on you. When you explained your location, she forwarded the request through
dispatch to the police in that area (Cole Harbour RCMP). | did not find any documented evidence
regarding Corporal Welke having constant contact with you, which could be considered stalking
or harassing. As stated above in this report, Corporal Welke did converse with you in person and
on the telephone; however, the versions of those interactions are conflicting. | cannot determine
that your version of the facts is more compelling or accurate than that of Corporal Welke; on
balance, | conclude it is not. While Corporal Welke did not have written record that she updated
you, | find that she did attempt to investigate some of your allegations, however you did not
provide her with the required information to make further inquiries on your behalf. Therefore, I
do not support your allegation.
Regarding Allegation #2, after reviewing all the information and evidence available before me, |
find that Corporal Welke did not demonstrate bias towards you based on your sexual orientation.
Corporal Welke denied that she made comments to you about your sexual orientation or made
any other disparaging remarks to or about you. During the interaction you had with Corporal
Welke, the specifics of your personal life, other than a concern for your mental weil-being, did
not factor into any conversation nor was your sexual orientation documented. | have not been
presented with any other evidence to support your allegation. Therefore, | do not support your
allegation.
Mr. Jewers, | would like to offer a sincere apology for the length of time it took to finalize this
public complaint. It is beyond the mandated response time to complete a Public Complaint
investigation and to provide a Final Report. We will strive to provide a timelier response in the
future.
Page | 7
================================================================================
D. Conclusion
Please be advised that pursuant to section 45.64 of the RCMP Act, | am notifying you that the
investigation into this complaint has now been concluded. Furthermore, according to section
45.7(1), if you are not satisfied with the manner in which your complaint has been disposed by
the RCMP, you may request a review by the CRCC by writing to them within 60 days after
receiving this RCMP Final Report at the following address or online at the following webpage:
Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP
P.O. Box 1722, Station B
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P OB3
Fax: 1-613-952-8045
Or
www.crcc-ccetp.gc.ca/en/request-review-form
Yours truly,
wally Bushell
Operations Officer - East
Halifax Regional Detachment
cc: Corporal Jessica Welke
H Division Professional Responsibility Unit
National Public Complaints Directorate
Civilian Review and Complaints Commission
Page| 8
================================================================================
May 10th 2025 – 2025-05-10_CRCC-Detailed-Submission_TWNN-Final.docx -
Document Tiny URL: https://tinyurl.com/rfwwuhb8
HTML Tiny URL: https://tinyurl.com/3kuxmvc5
Google Doc Tiny URL: https://tinyurl.com/jv2xmks5
FULL – DOC TINY - HTML Tiny – GOOGLE DOC
Date: July 1st 2025
Name: 2025-07-01_Response_to_RCMP_June-6_Letter_and_CRCC_Investigation_Request.docx
HTML: https://tinyurl.com/yck6m99v
DOC: https://tinyurl.com/mukfj729
GOOGLE DOC: https://tinyurl.com/2vxksv8b
