The Wolf And The Neural Network
|
Submitted By: |
Scott Jewers |
|
Subject: |
Complaint against Kristen Holm Extending to Emergency Mental Health Doctor and NSHA Staff and NSHA Staff A. |
|
Date: |
November 30th 2023 |
This response is based off how Kristen Holm has presented her record of events to me so far. I will absolutely make adjustments and apologize if data is presented that contradicts anything I say here. I also maintain my Chartered rights, especially in regards to freedom of expression. A video series consisting of 20 + videos has been created, covering the topics and interactions with the individuals. The Series is called, The Wolf and The Neural Network (TWNN) and a video will be created from this document.
This document was produced in response to the submission by Kristen Holm November 16th 2023. Two days prior, I had made my submission showing generally what Kristen Holm would try to do based on the records provided by the College. I didn't know there would be a direct letter, or I would have waited and done a single directed submission. So now, as Kristen Holm has made her actual submission I see it appropriate to directly respond to her statements as to add direct clarity in that context. Meaning this document should only be used in Tandem, with "College Submission regarding Kristen Holm November 14th 2023.docx" which was submitted November 14th 2023.
Thank you.
Notes: Within my submission November 14th 2023. On page 7 of my submission I asked about them writing "hallucinations". I would like to clarify, it appears, they put a negative (-) next to the Hallucination and positive (+) to Delusions Page 10 however this same document is a perfect illustration of desperation, phishing and digging these people did. Note also tried to use me moving around in my chair as Behavior / psychomotor activity / involuntary movements Page 10. While they said in another "lots of hand gestures" while I can show you a Video of Dan Kinsella on CTV where he spoke with his hands the whole time it was like a puppet show...This is desperation by NSHA... There are none of these complaints with HRP, There is nothing behavioral listed about the video by professional Standards and absolutely nothing noted by the Officer whom I sat completely calm with for 10+ hours. And nothing noted like that by Kristen Holm and or her staff. While On approximately August 16th 2022 I have requested the video footage from NSHA as to prove my behavior and be transparent because I have nothing to hide. While remember they didn't record the conflict of interest, what these people did or that I was denied a lawyer... They did this as to specifically stigmatize the record and bias the reader.
The sheer negligence is staggering.
Breakdown of response from Kristen Holm (Received November 16th 2023)
"He was protesting at the Police department to prove facts of a theory / conspiracy he had been working on since 2019. The Police were concerned that he was unwell. On assessment in psychiatric emergency, he was noted to be expressing delusional beliefs regarding multiple public figures"
Here again, is the first issue the mismatch between HRP and NSHA record. It states I was protesting. That is an absolute, non-contestable misrepresentation of fact. I absolutely did not protest in any way. I Stated in advance, and at the time that It appeared I had enough evidence to arrest the Chief of Police for his involvement, or someone set him up to fail. Again, Halifax Regional Police literally called themselves a "Conflict of Interest", meaning they themselves are explicitly, and in no uncertain terms stating they should not and cannot be trusted. Please let that really set in... and think about NSHA did...
In May 2019 my wallet was involved is something that Halifax Regional Police at the time themselves stated was "part of something ongoing". Meaning it is absolutely reasonable to assume my wallet may have been involved in something Criminal. Any lawyer will tell you that. In fact, it seems that a Lawyers recommendation whenever your wallet is found by Police is to get a Lawyer because Police will fabricate a story around it as it "places" you somewhere and can create "probable cause" so police can do whatever they want which is at the core concern with the timing and event overlap between myself, JDIrving and Jim Perrin April 18th 2019, June 15th 2019 and November 19th 2019 before ever knowing Jim Perrin even existed. See, Jim Perrin was Commander of The Criminal Investigation Unit and Superintendent of HRP. I would get my Wallet back June 5th 2019 and Jim Perrins Job would be posted with JDIrving June 17th 2019 and Transferred November 19th 2019, the same day i get my Job Interview with Government, And Dan Kinsella states there will be an apology for street checks, and TorStar shuts down their Halifax Office. But my main point is, just by having an open case, "they" could deny someone security clearance or cause other issues. And Jim Perrin could reopen a case, and nobody would question it what so ever. This then to the HR Managers looks like I was denied clearance, and so you can sell the story to employees who knew i was really smart and was targeted. This is a non-contestable fact, whether they did it or not. It is absolutely a reasonable statement. One that Kristen Holm states is clearly retarded. March 2022 I seen JDIrving sold Brunswick news Inc. to Postmedia, this led me to the EMIC (SCL Group - Cambridge Analytica) Contracts which I then correlated the significance of the data with my GPS being set to Residence A. While June 23rd 2022 when I received my Freedom Of Information request back from Halifax Regional Police , the same day "Irving Shipbuilding president Kevin Mooney resigns" - LINK this is not to say this is specifically because of me or this core issue. It's reasonably also largely due to the security considerations and changes to national security after instability in US Politics as these CEO's were American. There are other factors and a much more detailed review is in production. And can be seen in the document already submitted. So why did Kristen Holm leave it out? Well think about it, you can hear me directly reference it again in NSHA Audio Recording F August 5th 2022. When Kristen Holm then calls it "tangential".
The important part here is that Kristen Holm is stating that the very question regarding my wallet and regardless of who it involved is Clearly Mentally retarded. When it's a completely valid reason to be concerned and to be engaging with Halifax Regional Police on August 2nd 2022. And this fact should absolutely have been clarified in her record as it clearly and substantially changes the reader's perception. This is especially bad because the record between NSHA and HRP Doesn't match. Which is the responsibility of NSHA and HRP. Showing a direct pattern of their abuse within the record.
I defer to my First written Submission to the college November 14th 2023. Which included a long form of what occurred during those months.
"he was assessed by 2 separate physicians in the emergency room who determined he was unwell and met the criteria for involuntary assessment under IPTA"
NSHA Staff A, admitted their record is incomplete. While NSHA Records and HRP Records are inconsistent. While they didn't record that I asked for a Lawyer or the conflict of interest. While the Emergency Mental Health Doctor then gets up mocking straddles a door and mocks and humiliates me trying to get Halifax Regional Police to join in. While this all Makes sense now. See NSHA Staff A didn't record the conflict of interest or asking for a lawyer. While the Emergency Mental health doctor knew I was fine, i sat there 10 + Hours in handcuffs and could answer any and all questions. And the Emergency mental Health Doctor didn't have time to process what I told them about Halifax Regional Police while the record didn't reflect it. So when the officer came in the room and I asked how appropriate it was. They didn't properly reflect the issue, and she couldn't process it... so the Emergency Mental Health doctor called me paranoid, when it's a completely VALID statement. It makes sense now who she made weird statements like its' late and we should keep you" and "you don't have a place to stay" and her claiming I'm paranoid the police are "after" me. She was trying to convince herself because she knew I was fine, and it wasn't matching what she seen wrote down. She even said "I'm not here to fact check you", showing you I deferred to evidence. When she mocked and humiliated me, I sat there completely calm and said "this is really inappropriate right now".
While the officer who did laugh and go along with the straddling and humiliating would then yell in my face. While I was told by the Emergency Mental Health Doctor I wasn't denied a lawyer, while they only offered me one after they already admitted me. While then just after they left, when I went and asked NSHA Staff A for a phone to contact a lawyer they said "honey there is no phone".
While these parties were all involved in a Privacy breach regarding my Book Bag -> Wallet -> Health Card (PHI - Privacy Breach), ID's and Financial Information . PAGE 73
This was also all directly noted in written submission to NSHA October 22nd 2022? - LINK - it would have been submitted earlier but my mother was very sick.
Those 2 separate Physicians Kristen?
"Collateral was obtained from Mr Jewers' mother, Debbie Jewers", who expressed significant concern that "something was happening to him"
All I can see is up all night "on that computer" and pacing back and forth!? What does this even mean? My computer is my Education System, My programing Station, My Source of Reading, My Gaming System, I watch Movies and TV on my computer, my whole profession revolves around my desktop computer I even have 3 Monitors for development. We live in rural Nova Scotia, the closest Gas Station is 30+ minutes away in one direction, there is very little to do out here. But not one single person who knows me will call me anti-social. While I'm literally working on a massive project The Wolf and the Neural Network (TWNN). While on PAGE 80 you will see my Mother deferred to My Aunt Glenda who told Kristen Holm there was absolutely nothing wrong with me and did not substantiate anything my mother said. And given this project, and the seriousness. What does "something is happening to him" even mean? Do you see how confusing this is? How was my physically and mentally disabled mother going to sort this out? The facts are Kristen Holm seen just some retard she could take advantage of.
Reader imagine Kristen Holm, someone of "Authority" calling my mentally and Physically Disabled mother and telling her that Police, another Authority reviewed this, Scott was given due process and determined Scott was retarded. And that I was outside of Halifax Regional Police protesting and causing issues and interfering. When none of that happened? Imagine my mentally and Physically Disabled mother trying to understand this when Kristen Holm calls herself a professional and Kristen Holm can't answer even basic questions. How was my mother going to sort this out? How can Kristen Holm blame her, but Kristen not blame herself?
So let's talk about my Mother and I'll show you how Kristen Holm not only degraded our relationship and my responsibilities and humiliated me August 3rd 2023 but also how she left out how serious my mother's disabilities were. Just after getting out of Mount Hope, we found out my mother had a 17 CM Tumor / Cyst leaking puss into her body. Objectively showing how sick she was on top of the serious Mental and Physical disabilities. I told Kristen Holm specifically how mentally and physically sick my mother was, I told her my mother couldn't understand this and how she shouldn't be left alone. My mother could barely lift her feet... I told Kristen about the serious behavioral issues we were having, especially lately. And this Tumor /. Cyst shows, on top of all the witnesses I can produce, and on top of the pre-existing issues that something serious was going on. Issues that I had to deal with alone because no family members would help. Mom would sometimes stand there, piss on the floor and say "what's it to you", I've watched her shit in front of dollar store. I've cleaned piss and shit around a 1,000 times. I've done Heimlich at least 3 times. Within the 6 months Prior, She was running with a pillow on fire. Burned her arms, and she didn't feel it. She told me "I feel like I'm losing my mind". She would watch the same show multiple times a day and say she didn't see it. If I even watch a science show, its "oh your retarded like your father". While in the months leading up to my False imprisonment at mount Hope, Mom was falling more and having issues specifically in the night when getting up out of bed. By September 2023, I was picking mom up off the floor while she was laying in her own excrement. She couldn't help me, I had to lift all of her myself while she was so sick she couldn't even tell me what was wrong. My younger sister and I took her to Emergency in Sherbrook NS. Asking them to please admit her. Mom couldn't even respond to the Doctors Questions when they asked. It was very frustrating for the Doctor but he did not admit her and sent her home while advising to hydrate, and change to diet. While in the hospital after her surgery November 2022, NSHA staff interacted and seen the different behavioral and cognitive issues. Staff took me aside and asked "How long have you been dealing with this" and I just cried... they were also stating something like there seemed to signs of constricted blood vessels or something indicating possible onset of dementia in brain scans. She wouldn't eat, and was paranoid. I spent days with her, as much as I could afford. My feet were literally covered in blisters from walking to see her. Mom died January 29th 2023. All of which can be independently verified by Medical records. Showing I was absolutely truthful, and forthcoming.
I told mom I was working on this project phase, "The Wolf and the Neural Network - ALPHA" and it would take me a long hard month. I started June 14th 2022. It was released July 11th 2022. In total it was 424 Data Points. Mostly all cited. In 27 Days. It's a massive undertaking and required my full attention. Which my mother took as me not wanting anything to do with her. And how I'm going to leave her. But is clearly the foundation of well researched, well reviewed topic. By a technical expert. Directly within my field of study, and profession. Exactly what my Computer is intended for.
While please remember Kristen Holm left out that my Mother Deferred to My Aunt who clearly defended me, and did not substantiate what my mother said PAGE 80.
While regarding the time line, my mother was extremely high risk during COVID March 2020 - March 2022. There was literally globally instability and job markets crashing. I couldn't just move, while i had all these responsibilities and bills. And then where, into a box while there is a deadly virus in the hallways and when you can't even meet people as to find a partner? While Nursing Homes were exponentially more dangerous than home? I cleaned my mother, helped her shower, combed her hair and took care of her the best I could during COVID flare-ups. She had a life with at least some dignity, and someone who cared about her and loved right until to the end. No matter what she did, or what Kristen Holm made her do.
Because the facts are my relationship and care for my mother was much more complex, involved and complicated than just sometimes cooking and cleaning which is what Kristen Holm recorded. I could go on for hours, and will to a judge and jury if that's required but I don't want to humiliate my mother or degrade her... the reality is she was really sick. While I will have witnesses and medical records to back it. While in my reports and Video (July 25th 2023) I stated that Kristen Holm demeaned me in our meetings, while demeaning my care for my Mother during a Global Pandemic. And these omissions by Kristen Holm match that very same abusive behavior which I cannot fabricate.... Just as I cannot fabricate a Cyst / Tumor leaking puss into her body. While Kristen Holm may try to say she was testing me or pushing me to see how I would react. But then why misrepresent and downplay it in the record?
Kristen Holm knew what she specifically had to omit from the record as to bias the reader and attach stigma. So she could blame everyone else and claim "Plausible Deniability".
Do you see the pattern College?
"Collateral was also obtained from Mr. Jewers' Family Physician, who was aware of Mr. Jewers' expressing delusions, had referred him to Mental Health Services however Mr. Jewers had not followed up.
I talked to my Doctor about this because it was serious. And he was also my mother's Family doctor. Which is the same reason I wanted to talk to Doctor Bradley (My mother's Phycologist).I spoke with my Family Doctor and they most definitely didn't call it delusions, in fact when the heard what occurred, they were shocked about what occurred and my side of it. Just as everyone has been. Let's be clear, while working at JDIrving, I had mentioned wondering if I jokingly in conversations said I wondered if I had ADHD when I was kid and never got tested but then realized these people might try to use that statement against me in some way. I and my Doctor agreed I don't have it but I wanted to cover my bases on official record in case it was subpoenaed. I also had them send me for an MRI in 2020 so there would be a comparative record and for transparency. While I never asked or pleaded with them to just believe me or anything like that. Because we all assumed these people would use my mother and father against me. My own mother said "you know they are going to use me against you". While to be perfectly clear I did contact the ADHD clinic, they did a quick test over the phone and said clearly no. As I had thought. I was simply being thorough for the record. And I can LITERALLY PROVE THAT. It is absolutely amazing what Kristen Holm takes out of context to fit her violent delusions and cognitive bias.
Just like contacting Doctor Bradley, was regarding my mother. And how serious the events were. My family wouldn't help at ALL. I didn't know what to do and needed help with her. While I wanted to discuss the core issue with him and this involved all of us.
Kristen Holm called and completely misrepresented the issue and circumstances to fit her bigotry, prejudice and bias. And now she will blame everyone else but herself. Her whole game is to blame everyone else while she is a hero.
"He was 100% convinced events were real and connected and related to himself he did not think his mind may be playing tricks on him"
December 23rd 2021 - Here is from a massive security review. "I'm not saying this was all to deal with me, or about me. I suspect this was a General Plan that spiraled out of control. I'll highlight how my role inside it was manipulated and how that seems to have evolved with time." - LINK
August 5th 2020 - Disclaimer at top of my email (letter) sent to JDIrving the day before Stephen McNeil resigned "As always, please question everything I say, this document is clearly biased towards my point of view." - LINK
July 11th 2022 - Submission of The Wolf and the Neural Network - ALPHA - "for research purposes attached is a Global Security review in the form of data points that's wide open for interpretation... All to build your own story as to make you own choices and interpret how you want"
So what event or set of events specifically!? What does "he did not think his mind may be playing tricks on him" mean in the context of this issue? How can she make that statement but she herself not specify? Why doesn't she state what exactly is profound and why it is so? Because she can't because Admission under IPTA was not based on facts and evidence. It was based on bigotry, Prejudice and Bias. College... Where in these statements do you see anything remotely like the notion "100%"? You will find it nowhere. It's literally and undeniably a direct fabrication of Kristen Holms bigotry, prejudice and bias. While I can produce many more examples. There are also literally hundreds of lawyers, government officials and media on the Main Email Thread who have seen me explicitly and repeatedly state this was not about me. Over and over. Throughout my work I have clearly stated it over and over. While I was only aiming for a 70% and I think I'm hitting 85%+. While I used a Non Zero reasoning approach (1% Approach) similar to AI as to account for Systems or ideas such as Target Audience Analysis and Spyware. While all these parties see me directly asking all parties to not just believe me, and begging people to be critical. That is a non-contestable fact. Inside The Wolf and The Neural Network (TWNN), you see me admit significant amounts of bias, while cautioning away from Conspiracy Theories. And nowhere will you see me say his was 100% about me or 100% of any set of events or facts is real... Nowhere... Kristen Holm is fabricating this. Just as they left out The Wolf and The Neural Network (TWNN) while it appears she then mocks "research project" and the context of a "book". While this is clearly as very well detailed and researched set of topics, that exist independent of me and I am clearly a technical expert. A good example is how she fabricated the events with Jim Perrin and how he was involved in her record when clearly she could have asked questions to clarify, while all data was public, directly showing a direct connection with JDIrving within seconds. There were so many opportunities, why didn't she take them? You know why...
In the recording you hear me say 12:13 - "What if it comes out that this is true" - Scott. And look what Kristen is doing. Lying, cheating and stealing. While she misrepresents the record, facts and evidence.
These "professionals" used vague notions and stigma attached to their chosen generalizations. They knew how to lie and how to irritate the situation. While Look at her comments Kristen Holm - 4:16 - "Police, you know, honestly, they do that... they do that all the time. Right". And her calling them "Grand Delusions". Just because it's Police and who she perceives as "the right kind of white". Implicit guilt for me and implicit innocence for them. Just as with her colleagues. Even when Kristen knows they made serious mistakes, they are just innocent and I'm just guilty. She said to me "it can't be you". Her own nurse said about the conflict of interest being a good point and is not something they ever heard before. All while Kristen Holm intentionally removes those details from the record as to bias anyone reading because anyone listening for even a minuet would know something else was going on. While make note of her overuse of "pressured speech" especially when she leaves out massive amounts of detail. Because anything that's not just "YES MASTER" is pressured or tangential, by Nature of her claim. Listen to the recording August 5th 2022 - NSHA Audio Recording F and consider the circumstances and everything I went through, and now being admitted. I handled it extremely well while everything I talked about was directly pertinent. But Kristen called it "pressured speech" and "tangential". It's always going to be "god of the gaps"... things I can't directly refute. While I have no freedom of expression or association. Think about this... Think about in that recording... Even if I told Kristen Holm about EMIC (SCL Group - Cambridge Analytica), she knows she couldn't have answered it so what would she have done then? She would have lied further, and moved the goal post while to prove she would do it, it's exactly what she is doing now even with all this evidence, even knowing the mistakes her colleges made. The fundamental fact is there was never any reasoning with Kristen Holm. She was Judge, Jury and Executioner who had everything to gain from me being guilty and look what she did. And look how she still won't face her delusions.
And watch now she will say something like "well I didn't want to play into the delusions just in case" as she is always going to move the goal post while she hides behind all the rights she denied me. And it's all so she can pretend she is a hero just helping everyone "live their best life"...
"It was clear he was experiencing a mental illness with profound delusional beliefs, including delusions of reference"
If it is so clear then where is the evidence!!? What is profound!? If it's so obvious that I'm just retarded, then Kristen Holm should be able to easily provide facts and evidence of dates and connections right? Instead... it's just because I'm me and they are them. While she leaves out what the other staff did reasonably as to specifically irritate the situation.
It's think its "clear" what Kristen Holm is doing. She is saying I'm obviously just retarded, so I must be lying about all the abuses or she will claim I was confused. Anything she can do to make herself out to be a hero.
It's everyone else, but her. You would almost think that Kristen Holm suffers from Violent Delusions wouldn't you?
"in response to Mr. Jewers' complaint i believe my care was appropriate"
Part of Kristin holms responsibility was to properly record the complaint and understand how serious the situation was along with how serious the claim being made regarding Halifax Regional Police was. They called themselves a "conflict of interest" a direct statement saying they cannot and should not be trusted. While Kristen Holm lists her explicit trust in them. While they are directly saying, they cannot and should not be trusted. You see the issue right? While look at the obvious omissions.
The only care Kristen Holm provided was in regard to her own self-interests at any cost and I was a victim of her Violent Delusions.
I sent an email (letter) - LINK - https://tinyurl.com/ym44dhsc August 5th 2020 and the next day, August 6th 2020 Stephen McNeil resigned. Below is the entry to Jodi Posavad (3RD Party HR) All I did was change the Name Jodi to Kristen. It's actually incredible... and really highlights the Systemic Failure and staggering Negligence.
Kristen - Now do you still think I was distasteful pointing out Jims past? The Missing Evidence Statements and false statements? And Then the Privacy Violations?
You must see Jim now? You must see what they did here and what you allowed? If you don't feel shame right now then I legit feel bad for you as a human, this late in your life and with your experience, I have no doubt that you know exactly what these people did and why they did it. And you basically helped them.
So it appears that you sold me and everyone else out so you could ease your own fear and take home a big pay check... quick and easy right? I wonder... What did they pay you for your complacency in this Charade?
All while I did my due diligence as a Canadian and Professional for free. And I did it respectfully given then circumstances and in accordance with Law.
Which you didn't do but was also your responsibility! You are welcome!
But honestly where were you!? Did you raise any concerns about this yourself? You didn't know any of this? You couldn't reason at least some of what I was saying was reasonable?
Did you even know about Jims past before going in? Did you do any privacy research yourself?
Regardless - I think you actively knew something was wrong and you made a bad decision.
So I ask respectfully given a generalized scenario, not this specific one - Consider a hypothetical person - an Attractive, Wealthy, Married-Straight White Person who does not want to Question Systemic Racism in general and Quantified Systemic Harassment in two separate cases. When fully spelled out for them and many examples given, they completely ignore how relative the points are to the whole current situation.
Think, what would it mean if they never contact the other party, and never raise an internal concern about the conflict of interest (RROSH) and rejects any and all ideas regarding Privacy Expectations?
What would that mean about that person?
I'm wonder if that person tells themselves.... "It's more complicated than that" ... trying to explain and excuse this all away instead of doing the right thing and facing their own shame...
I wonder how that's any different than Jim and his "Someone else is accountable" approach to life.
.... It's something to think about isn't it Kristen?
Anyways, for you in this situation - you can still help me, yourself and Canada here. Irving does not own you. No legal Contract can remove your obligation to protect Canadians Rights, you still have a civil responsibility to raise your concerns! And you have clear justification to protect any of those workers at the shipyard or anyone involved in this.
Kristen... I sat around and worried about you losing your licence. I thought maybe I should give you another chance to do the right thing. Everyone said no way, she is definitely a bad person and do not trust her... But I still felt bad for you. While in reflection, I probably felt bad for you because I knew I was going to dominate you. But now I see your response November 16th 2023 and it's quite clear, you weren't sitting around thinking about me and my rights and dignity. You were thinking about yourself and how to hide who and what you really are when it comes down to it... You are the embodiment of Systemic Failure.
December 10th 2019 - Sent to JDIrving as part of the fully quantified Harassment complaint - "...And know this - I faced one side of your bully personality already. And this time ill face the other side head on... but this time, I'm more educated on what a Narcissist is, this time... I have a pocket full of sharp facts right out of the gate, this time I have a stunning technical account and for extra points I've got a pretty darn good memory and I remember faces, times and events really well. I understand how technology works and I've got the fact that you people fumbled this multiple times not just with me. And I am all in. So if you want to drag everybody into this. Then we'll do it because in the end it's the right thing to do. And id really rather not - it's your choice and to me, it shows nothing but your clear disregard and contempt for the people affected - when you can just accept responsibility for your failure. So, know this - this is absolutely not going to disappear. The magic money wand you are so privileged to waving around isn't going to work. And now ...you will all have to blatantly look in someone's face and lie, misrepresent and bully and harass me and others further ...Straight to Canadas face for that matter. And then what - throw XXX or some other people to the sharks to protect yourself again? Blame everyone else but you?
Go ahead - but this time you won't be able to hide it.
This time, you will all be accountable.
And There will be absolutely no negotiating, compromise or concessions.
I have not lied to you once and I will not lie to you now.
If you wish to test my resolve - then we shall test it together"
(I'm not associating anything here, and if I did Kristen would call it retarded. So if you are uncomfortable with how you interpret this data. That's not my fault)
Good Luck Kristen.
Kristen Holm knows how bad this is and she is basically a cat being held over water. She doesn't even trust herself to answer basic questions. With my mother, mom was sick. And mom knew I was working on something for 2 years and had serious events occur. Imagine having Kristen Holm, calling you and telling you all this misinformation. My mother knew "something was going on" so how is she was interpreting this? How was she using it? "Up all day all night on that computer"... that's what she has!? While you see my mother defer to my aunt who completely defended me which Kristen Holm intentionally left out! The facts are Kristen Holm knew she would have to file a complaint against the NSHA Staff members and testify against Halifax Regional Police. And so, also JDIrving. Think about it... it's reasonable in her response She didn't include my Book Bag -> Wallet -> Health Card (PHI - Privacy Breach), ID's and Financial Information PAGE 73 because she knew how bad it looks. This is consistent and intentional behavior. While think about this... Kristen deferred to the record, while then she must know these people made incredible mistakes. While where is her acknowledgement of that in her reply? Conveniently Nowhere. While Isn't it something, that all this compelling evidence can exist however Kristen Holm doesn't think that maybe there is a chance her mind is playing tricks on her?
College - Everyone knows what this is. The Public will see it immediately as I think the following quote perfectly sums up the situation:
Video Link 6:10 a. "Look we understand the rules, the legal rules involving collusion" - Postmedia CEO Paul Godfrey on Torstar swap - https://youtu.be/UwIWpGWKzUQ?si=ffIDUYiMOBxEk7o_&t=370
The facts are it never mattered what was said, Kristen Holm was always going to lie. Which is the reason Easter Eggs are so important. Because I can show the College and Readers how consistent I am and have been. This has been covered before but I want to reiterate.... Remember, at Mount Hope I was reading Moby Dick well before any of the following occurred. Dick = Dominance = Wolf, Richard is my first name which is long for Dick as it should be - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard. I told Kristen Holm I'm not worried if someone see's my dick pics or is in my phone, I'm not shy or a paranoid person. I've let all my ex's access my phone without question. And the way I see it is, there are over 3 billion dicks on the planet... And I just happen to have the best one. And so, also explaining the applicability of "Dick Hating Nightmare Monster". Anyways, one of the characters is Starbuck. Starbuck is a character in Battle Star Galatica which is a Sci-Fi Show regarding Artificial intelligence (Which, although not directly related in any other way, the topic of AI is pertinent to my technological, ethical and cultural reviews but also artistic expression). At one point another Battle Star shows up, the Pegasus. Pegasus is the most widely known flavor of Spyware. While reading Moby Dick at Mount Hope, I was watching David Fraser, on CTV talk about Spyware and... Pegasus. And the reason they were talking about this? Because RCMP did their Parliamentary Study into Spyware during my stay at Mount Hope " - RCMP says it's not using controversial Pegasus spyware to covertly access cellphones " - LINK - https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/rcmp-spyware-privacy-commissioner-1.6544839. College - Remember Residence A, EMIC (SCL Group - Cambridge Analytica) and my GPS - LINK Any technologist will tell you it was reasonably Spyware. Well let's go further. Check the sheet where it states who is allowed to call about me you will see David Fraser listed PAGE 48. But it gets better, note the date of NSHA Audio Recording F. August 5th 2022. Two years to the day after I sent the letter in which it appears Stephen McNeil resigned the next day.
College - Do you see how consistent I am? My mother has a Cyst / Tumor leaking puss into her body... that's how consistent I am. Along with all this well detailed and well organized evidence all while Kristen Holm can't even answer basic questions or take basic responsibility while she constitutes to directly omit information to bias the reader:
Scott - (3:20) "That's right, but every date that I listed I can prove was an event because I...We went through all of this... So I understand that might seem like that...but...like, if like... I'm a technical expert. Right. I consider myself investigative journalist as well.... Right. So I went through and I did my job. If I was a security researcher you would say "Good job".... if I was a "detective" you would say good job... As an investigative journalist... I did a good job. And like... what I would like to do is sit down and have a conversation with somebody you know to discuss the facts before you decide this is Psychosis. And you go and put pills in me because I feel like that kills my individuality. You know like... i feel like... it's a form of cruel and unusual punishment. Because when you look back at what the Police did like. It's very inappropriate that they brought me in under those circumstances.
See, I knew Easter Eggs were required and is part of the 1% Approach to combat ideas such TAA, including my own Bias. Because I knew who and what Kristen Holm was before she even got up in the morning. EMIC (SCL Group - Cambridge Analytica) knows it, RCMP knows it, and Halifax Regional Police knew it. While I'm sure the Public will see right through her act. They all know the decision to admit me by Kristen Holm had nothing to do with me, facts or evidence. This had everything to do with Kristen Holm not being able to face her own over inflated sense of self-worth and self-importance. And I paid the price for her Violent Delusions. While it then makes me wonder... how many other people have paid the price just so Kristen can call herself a hero? How can she be trusted in a less obvious situation, especially where she believes in implicit innocence for Police (Raw Systemic Bias)? What kind of abuses would she dismiss and what kind of abuse has she already dismissed? How can the Review Board ever trust her when they can see how she omitted key facts intentionally? When Patients see how she blatantly lied will that not that cause justified trust issues between them, their families and her?
I'll give you an example... Since I'm clearly retarded then Kristen should have absolutely no problem directly answering the following questions. While please know they are Mostly rhetorical and symbolic as to make a general point however I would love to see her show some integrity and professionalism while facing her own personal delusions and directly answer.
College - Look at the evidence. It made sense to walk down to Halifax Regional Police and be calm, cool and collected August 2nd 2022 and I did exactly that. I was well prepared, organized and respectful. While as you can see, I absolutely dominated them... All of them. So why would I risk lying about NSHA? Lying here would discredit me elsewhere right? Its makes the most sense for me to be completely truthful which is what I'm doing.
So then January 29th 2023, 1 AM In the Morning. Tim Houston showing up - LINK - https://tinyurl.com/2ssx5r96 . If I said anything it would have been their word against mine. And with Jamie Irving being on the board of directors, soon to be Executive Director of Postmedia Play? Then factoring in the other special interests around Bill C-18 - the Online News Act? Kristen Holm, NSHA, HRP and RCMP would all be off the hook and they all get to hide from Systemic Racism and Systemic Harassment. While remember they tried to delete the EMIC Contracts as to remove direct evidence. While Remember there were witnesses to lights in my house that same morning (January 29th 2023), reasonably a break and enter.
From the College, I will accept nothing less than Kristen Holm losing her license.
The case has also been deferred to RCMP for investigation into Criminal Negligence, Criminal Assault, Conspiracy and Fraud by Kristen Holm, NSHA Staff A and Emergency Mental Health Doctor. RCMP have been asked to treat all omissions and inconsistencies in the record of as obstruction and to seek maximum sentences for any charges.
