This response is based off how Nancy Murphy has presented her record of events to me so far. I will absolutely make adjustments and apologize if data is presented that contradicts anything I say here. I also maintain my Chartered rights, especially in regards to freedom of expression.

A video series consisting of 20 + videos has been created, covering the topics and interactions with the individuals. The Series is called, The Wolf and the Neural Network and a video will be created from this document.

Goal. Ethically Flip Nancy Murphy In One Move. Bonus Points: Without the College having to suggest it.

Warning: I would strongly suggest watching the following video on EMIC as to understand the kind of evidence, and players that may be involved. This is serious and lying in this case, could result in serious criminal charges being laid. It's only 6 and a Half minutes.

First, you'll note in Nancy Murphy's reply the first thing she listed were her Credentials. But I suspect Nancy Murphy record my credentials. While what's interesting here is that HRP and HRP Professional Services also didn't include Credentials. And when considering this, regardless of intention, it's exactly what you do expect if you are trying to passively discredit someone by omission of specific facts. You would then substitute those facts with words like "collusion" that also have the shock value of the stigma attached with it. Which is what Nancy Murphy proceeds to do. While on this point, I want to be very to very clear to Nancy Murphy and the College. Using a term as significant as "collusion" implies that Nancy Murphy is directly accusing me of making an accusation against JDIrving or individuals. When in truth I specifically told Nancy how inappropriate it was for making me talk about it or be specific, for that reason.

While, let's take a closer look at Nancy Murphy's claims August 2^nd and 3^rd 2022. Nancy Murphy misrepresented the role of the HRP Officer in her statement to the College, it is a fact that Nancy Murphy's statement that is not consistent with anything at all in my work, or even the general reality. Nancy stated "The Police Officer designated to his theft case resigned in connection with that case and began working for Irving Oil". The HRP Officer was Jim Perrin, Super Intendent and Commander of the Criminal Investigation Unit with Halifax Regional Police. He was directly involved Wortley report and was basically the spokesperson for Halifax Regional Police. What was concerning, were events that occurred with Halifax Regional Police, The Overlap with Postmedia and what Occurred while we conducted an Investigation at JDIrving early 2020. (While not mentioning EMIC to Nancy Murphy). These basic relationships were discussed only to explain why they were a conflict of interest. It's a solid, simple discussion. While I maintained how complex it was, and deferred to the research tool "the Wolf and The Neural Network" for anything exact. I even told her I was thinking about writing book, and "the Wolf and The Neural Network" would be the name... While on that Topic. The Chief of Halifax Reginal Police, Dan Kinsella has now retired. Jamie Irving has stepped down from Postmedia. While you check the involvement and relationships to Bill C-18, the online news Act For yourselves.

All of that aside, what's really at its core here is specifics. I told Nancy Murphy how inappropriate it all was. That HRP called themselves a conflict of interest and said they were going to get me paper to file a complaint and came back and arrested me. As a professional, she should have recognized how serious that was. Nancy Murphy was asked for a phone to contact a lawyer and her response was "Honey, there is no phone". While even now, Nancy Murphy will use any and all complexity against me saying that's what she considered rambling. When I never rambled. I only spoke when asked something specific while maintaining how inappropriate it was. All while I sat calmly for 10+ hours and bothered no one.

The fact is, Nancy Murphy was judge, jury and executioner and she had everything to gain by me being guilty. HRP has already pulled the trigger of Systemic Bias and I was no longer human to NSHA and Nancy Murphy. And Nancy Murphy and NSHA knew that if they found me innocent that they would have to file complaint and reasonably have to testify against Halifax Regional Police.

And this is why you are going to find so many inconsistencies in record. And why you watch her move the goal post and try to blame complexity as she blames me and everyone else.

Next, Nancy Murphy's recollection of events.

1. "Flight of Ideas" - The main point here is to then think about how concerning it is that Nancy Murphy then goes on to characterize my general description as a "Flight of Ideas" while she didn't even record the basics properly, didn't even record why I was refuting IPTA, didn't record that I clearly stated I didn't want to talk about it and it was inappropriate. And didn't record that I deferred to the research tool, "The Wolf and The Neural Network". While she didn't record credentials.
2. "And he felt these incidents were connected and targeted him specifically" - this is the prefect illustration Nancy Murphy's negligence, bigotry, prejudice and bias. This Absolutely a blatant lie.
   1. There are literally hundreds of lawyers and government officials on thread, that have direct evidence that I have made it perfectly clear that this was not all about me. And I have maintained throughout that the data indicates that it's most likely that I got caught up in something and or they thought I was someone I wasn't.

The Nipples of the Beast (Body Points)

To speak to each Point Presented by Nancy Murphy.

1. Point 1 - Regarding everything Nancy Murphy wrote being fabricated.
   1. Everything Nancy Murphy wrote was absolutely fabricated and is a clear product of her Bigotry, prejudice and bias. Nancy Murphy didn't even record the basics of why I contested IPTA. This is on top of being told how serious this was all while she admits her record is incomplete.
   2. Nancy Murphy Didn't record I asked for a lawyer. Or the Interaction where she stated "Honey there is no Phone". And nowhere in the record is it recorded that Nancy Murphy or NSHA staff advised me of my rights, or specifically offer the option.
   3. All of this creates a strong argument that Nancy Murphy either knew what she was doing or was blatantly negligent.
2. Point 2 - Not Asking for Consent and Me being denied a Lawyers for 10+ Hours. A lot of this was covered in October 22^nd 2022 submission.
   1. Nancy Murphy did not ask for consent regarding taking Blood or CT scan
      1. Bloodwork - I advised the worker how inappropriate it was especially because I was denied a lawyer. They told me I looked guilty if I didn't just do it.
         1. "What's the problem if you have nothing to hide"
      2. CT scan - I advised how inappropriate it was. Asked the officer if they would take off their Gear, get in here and if these people see anything that they think even looks different he would be committed.
         1. He truthfully said no. Because no rational person would.
   2. Nancy Murphy's was specifically asked for a Phone to contact a Lawyer, and specifically said "Honey there is no phone". This will clarified and addressed further in point 3.
3. Point 3 - Regarding the Doctor "Straddling a door "and humiliating me. Please read October 22^nd 2022 Submission for full story.
   1. To clarify and to generally apologize to Nancy Murphy. Nancy, I was only using the names NSHA gave me as I didn't want to keep anyone's Name on my record for privacy and security reasons. So, if NSHA didn't give me the names, I was left to assume that the admitting doctor was Nancy Murphy. However, the reports all make the time frames clear, and anyone looking at those time frames would know who I was talking about.
      1. Fore greater clarity, this means as per Nancy Murphy's clarification, this the Emergency Mental Health doctor would be the one who straddled the door, mocked and humiliated me. While my Book bag, with my name on it got sent to Mount Hope with an Agitated Person on self-admitted on drugs, before I ever spoke to The Emergency Mental Health doctor? While this visibly agitated person came to me the next day at Mount Hope unprompted and warned me about the police and my book bag and asked me to Rock, Paper Scissor for one of the $20 in my wallet. This story is actually much worse than this, and was outlined in submission to NSHA October 22^nd 2022.<LINK>
   2. regardless that after the interaction with the Emergency Mental Health doctor, I still directly and specifically asked Nancy Murphy and the security guard for a Phone as to contact a lawyer. And here I asked the nurse, who is believed to be Nancy Murphy, who in response to asking for a phone to contact a lawyer, said "honey there is no phone" while telling me my book bag told had already been sent over to Mount Hope.
   3. The fact that even now Nancy Murphy pointed to decision of this Emergency Mental Health doctor as justifying her own actions beforehand is terrifying and disgusting clearly illustrates her prejudice and bias. Nancy Murphy doesn't care about actual facts, what happened or about me as a person. She doesn't care that the Emergency health Doctor did that. She only cares about moving the goal post in her favor.

I believe it's very obvious that what Nancy Murphy did August 2^nd and 3^rd 2022 did not meet any standard of Care. And if Nancy Murphy still believes it did then then it only meets the standard of care associated with satisfying her own self interests. The facts are that legally a cattle had more rights than I did. HRP had already pulled the trigger of Systemic Bias so in reality was more like processed meat to Nancy Murphy and it perfectly matches how she treated me, she tossed me into the grinder, bagged me and tagged me. While had I been the "right kind of white" such as an Irving, McNeil, or Trudeau then Nancy Murphy and NSHA in general would never have done what they did.

As Canadians we have chartered rights to stop the very abuse Nancy Murphy and the Emergency Mental Health Doctor engaged in. And look in this situation, as soon as these individuals were told I was less that human look how quickly they striped my rights and dignity out of conveniences for themselves. While they figured, if it was that bad someone would just stop them and so NSHA staff, and Nancy Murphy quickly devolved into the very monster these rights are supposed to protect Them and Canadians from.

Please think about these specific inconsistencies in this self-admittedly incomplete record presented by Nancy Murphy. Her story is not adding up. Nancy Murphy claims to have exceptional record keeping except now in this specific circumstance and she just happened to make a mistake this time? And that mistake was that she just happened to keep out specific details about HRP being a conflict of interest and why I was contesting IPTA? While what about my book bag being sent before I seen the Doctor, and being denied a lawyer?

The fact are, that My Admission to Mount Hope under IPTA was not based on facts and Evidence which is what is required under IPTA. The facts are that IPTA was used specifically so I couldn't and wouldn't be able to provide facts and evidence. IPTA was used as form of Arbitrary Detention, Defamation and Coercive Aversion by HRP and then NSHA. It was used to basically justify torturing me.

The Toenail of the Beast (Personal Message to Nancy Murphy)

You see the Players Nancy. You see the resignations. Including recently, with the Chief of Police. I have given you everything you need to make an informed decision. I have a lot more, and that includes audio recordings.

So now what now? Will try to say that I made it to complex and I'm the problem when you couldn't even record basic facts? You can try but... I suspect very few people are going to believe it Nancy. And when RCMP, CSIS, DND and Media start asking questions and your record doesn't add up do you realize that's obstruction, fraud and possibly conspiracy charges. All of which could carry Jail terms and while you may very well lose your License.

While aside from the reputational damage you have brought yourself, look damage you have caused and will cause to the reputation of NSHA's mental health program.

You have become the very Monster everyone fears.

While look at the events with NSHA. And do you think their legal teams are going to defend you or them? They are going to defend themselves.

In my opinion, your best play is to admit what you did Nancy. That way you can maintain and rebuild your reputation and I would do my best to be fair. It's your choice.

Good Luck.