The Wolf And The Neural Network
Re: Systemic Misconduct, Criminal Allegations, and Constitutional Violations by Members of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police
I am a technical expert with over 18 years of experience in systems analysis, programming, and IT infrastructure. On November 7, 2018, J.D. Irving / Irving Shipbuilding posted a job opening. I applied on November 13, 2018, began work on February 4, 2019, and my employment ended on July 26, 2019.
From the outset, I was subjected to targeted harassment. This was not an isolated workplace conflict — it was part of a broader pattern involving Halifax Regional Police (HRP), J.D. Irving, and federal institutions. A critical turning point came on March 27, 2019, with the release of the Wortley Report, which exposed systemic racism and illegal street checks by HRP. The very next day, a judge ordered an end to those practices, triggering sudden internal disruption within HRP. This appears to have catalyzed a broader institutional response — retaliation disguised as process.
On April 10, 2019, I formally raised concerns, requesting only that the harassment stop. By April 18, 2019, retaliatory patterns had already begun — including activity involving HRP. I was also assisting others at the time and had become too visible to be quietly removed. My presence and insight had drawn the attention of those with something to protect.
March 2019 was pivotal. Saltwire cut ties with Canadian Press and shifted its media alignment toward Postmedia and Reuters. Postmedia began targeting investigative journalist David Pugliese, who had previously exposed Irving’s influence in Canadian military procurement. Simultaneously, a national controversy erupted involving Procurement Canada, high-ranking Liberal officials, and Irving Shipbuilding President Kevin McCoy, who publicly threatened to sue media outlets reporting on internal government irregularities.
Notably, Pugliese’s article trail begins on November 8, 2018 — just one day after my job was posted — and aligns with the Liberal government’s early support of Bill C-18 (The Online News Act). This legislation, which became law on June 22, 2023, funneled tens of millions of dollars to media outlets such as Postmedia, TorStar, CTV, and CBC. These outlets had a vested financial and political interest in suppressing any narrative that might implicate their corporate allies. Coincidentally, around that same time, Postmedia and TorStar entered merger talks, and Jamie Irving stepped down as Executive Chair.
On May 27, 2019, my wallet was stolen. I immediately reported it and cooperated fully. I retrieved it on June 5, 2019, from HRP, who claimed it was linked to an “ongoing matter” but provided no explanation and gathered no evidence. Twelve days later, J.D. Irving posted a job opening for a “Physical Security Manager” (Job ID 19002740), which was later filled by Jim Perrin, then Commander of HRP’s Criminal Investigation Unit and Superintendent. May 2019 is a critical nexus — it links directly to events in November 2019 and to January 4, 2023, when Irving Shipbuilding was awarded a $1.6 billion contract. These same threads converge again around June 22, 2023, when Jamie Irving resigned as Executive Chair.
On May 31, 2022, I filed a Freedom of Information request with HRP regarding the wallet incident. I received a reply on June 23, 2022, stating the file was sealed due to "someone else's privacy." That same day, Kevin Mooney, President of Irving Shipbuilding, resigned — part of a now-predictable pattern of strategic resignations coinciding with key revelations.
On July 5, 2019, land registration activity was logged for 9330 Highway #7 in Stillwater, Nova Scotia — a location later linked to spyware and EMIC contracts. My phone’s GPS would be forcibly set to this exact address in early 2020. These contracts are tied to the same psychological warfare playbook used by Cambridge Analytica. That same day, Dan Kinsella was appointed Chief of Police at HRP, lining up perfectly with the EMIC timeline and HRP's structural shift.
November 19, 2019, marks another critical nexus. It links HRP, Irving Shipbuilding, media, and government actors — and corresponds with escalated harassment into December. I submitted a formal complaint to the Department of National Defence on November 23, 2019. Internal investigations at Irving Shipbuilding extended into early 2020.
On June 10, 2020, I protested local racism in Ecum Secum — a rural area more than 40 km from the nearest RCMP detachment. Two RCMP cruisers stalked me along the road. A journalist from the Guysborough Journal happened to stop. I told my story. The article ran front page on June 17, 2020 — and that same day, my internet was suddenly cut. It remained offline for two days until a technician repaired the line at the pole.
I was never affiliated with Black Lives Matter. I acted independently and never asked anyone to join me. My intent was simply to provoke local dialogue. But EMIC and DND documents later showed that BLM protesters were being profiled and targeted for influence operations. Whether I was mistaken for one or flagged independently, I had been marked.
On August 5, 2020, I submitted a formal letter and email demanding action. Premier Stephen McNeil resigned the very next day — August 6, 2020. The letter included references to canine behavior — wolves, collars, howling — as metaphors for loyalty, betrayal, and institutional psychology. This wasn’t abstract symbolism. It was part of a structured ethical and threat analysis I developed while conducting security assessments inside Irving Shipbuilding in early 2020.
What followed was chillingly predictable. DND and EMIC launched psychological operations across Nova Scotia — confirmed by reporters David Pugliese (Ottawa Citizen) and Brett Ruskin (CBC). The public theme? Releasing grey wolves and encouraging civilians to “howl.” These events were broadcast using media narratives almost identical to my own symbolic language. My email was sent on August 5. Yet the psy-ops campaign featuring wolves appeared publicly on August 3 — clear evidence my communications had been accessed before I sent them. Spyware was already in place.
They knew I had thoroughly outperformed them during the Irving investigation. So they pivoted: if they couldn’t discredit me intellectually, they would fabricate a victim narrative for themselves. That pivot included mail from ESDC/OPC going missing from my mailbox on September 15, 2020 — mail that dealt with jurisprudence and surveillance legality. Those events align with EMIC Contract #2 and coincide with the resignations of Premier McNeil and Kevin McCoy.
The forced GPS manipulation to 9330 Highway #7 was not random. It’s entirely plausible that my phone’s front-facing camera was used to capture my face viewing the location — fabricating a visual trail of “presence.” If they deleted GPS markers from my use of Pokémon Go in nearby Sherbrooke Village, they could simulate movement toward the spyware-linked address. This is textbook evidence planting.
Emma Briant, associate professor at Monash University, is now taking the Department of National Defence to court to obtain records on military propaganda operations targeting Canadian citizens. Her research confirms what I already knew: that both Canadian and American officials knew The Wolf Letter was not Russian disinformation — but tried to frame it as such anyway.
October 2nd 2024 – David Pugliese Ottawa Citizen - Legal action underway to force Canadian Forces to release propaganda document - https://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/defence-watch/legal-action-under-way-to-force-canadian-forces-to-release-propaganda-documents - “A professor is taking DND to court to force the release of records about the Canadian military’s various propaganda schemes, including its 2020 fake wolves exercise.”
The reality is simple: 9330 Highway #7 had to be burned. There were too many connections — too many overlapping systems, timelines, and actors. RCMP, HRP, DND, NSHA, J.D. Irving — all had reason to wipe the trail. So they pursued a controlled burn. And they built a case. Slowly, deliberately, they designed it to frame someone.
That someone was me.
They never expected anyone to piece together the EMIC contracts, the timing of Kinsella’s appointment, the layered resignations, and the spyware trail in a single cohesive timeline. They believed they were untouchable.
And when they falsely arrested me, tortured me, terrorized me, and allowed me to be sexually assaulted — they knew they had to cover it up even more aggressively. They deleted the EMIC contracts from the government’s searchable portal while HRP held its historic vote of no confidence against Chief Dan Kinsella in November 2022 — because they knew those contract dates matched the day he was appointed Chief. That’s why RCMP kept escalating. That’s why events like those involving Leyla Li and Duke University emerged on January 5, 2023 — another misdirection, another layer of deflection.
What began as a workplace complaint has now exposed a system-wide pattern of institutional retaliation, state surveillance, election interference, and targeted suppression.
I have documented every key moment, every resignation, every attempt to erase me.
That documentation is The Wolf and the Neural Network.
And that was only the beginning.
All data can be independently verified at www.TheWolfAndTheNeuralNetwork.com, which, as of May 10, 2024, contains 913 documented data points spanning over five years. The site has been fully generalized for accessibility—anyone with a web browser can access the information.
The platform includes:
A major update to the site is currently in development. All tools—including the codebase, utilities, and the site itself—are available freely under the TWNN public initiative: “I SEE YOU.”
Some additional resources:
Jan 30, 2024 - Brett Ruskin CBC - Leaked 'wolf letter' leaves military sheepish, internal emails show - https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/leaked-wolf-letter-nova-scotia-1.7093141
October 16th 2020 – VICE - Military Incompetence Unleashed a Wolf Psyop on Unsuspecting Canadians - https://www.vice.com/en/article/military-incompetence-unleashed-a-wolf-psyop-on-unsuspecting-canadians/
October 13th 2020 – David Pugliese Ottawa Citizen - Canadian military spent more than $1 million on controversial propaganda training linked to Cambridge Analytica parent firm - https://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/defence-watch/canadian-military-spent-more-than-1-million-on-controversial-propaganda-training-linked-to-cambridge-analytica-parent-firm
Cambridge Analytica / EMIC - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambridge_Analytica
Target Audience Analysis (TAA) Info-graphic – https://tinyurl.com/ap3zh4rv
I currently have two active national security cases:
The CRCC is advised to self-report this matter to CSIS immediately, including your failure to log, respond to, or escalate a national security concern when it was first raised. Failure to do so will constitute further obstruction and be treated as evidence of CRCC staff — including David and Carol — actively interfering with or suppressing an ongoing national security investigation. This will be reported accordingly.
EMIC Contract #1 (Matching 9330 Highway #7 Stillwater NS)
Image showing land registration events from Viewpoint.ca, alongside a screenshot from https://search.open.canada.ca/contracts/ confirming the presence of EMIC contracts. These contracts authorized the use of Target Audience Analysis (TAA), which falls under the scope of psychological warfare as defined by NATO.
Image of Target Audience Analysis (TAA) breakdown and lists of references:
Image showing official NATO documentation defining Target Audience Analysis (TAA) as a component of Psychological Operations (PsyOps).:
Image showing metrics used in TAA when evaluating unmarried males (me):
You stated that you reported “children were threatened”.
Q1. Whose children were threatened and what are the children’s names?
A1.
The children who were threatened are relatives of mine. I will not disclose their names. These are minors who were surveilled by an unknown individual claiming to be a “Private Investigator,” and I have every reason to believe law enforcement either ignored or concealed this incident. Considering the level of retaliation I have personally faced, and the lack of any case number or meaningful follow-up, disclosing their identities would put them at further risk.
It has been over several years since this matter was raised, and despite being shared with multiple RCMP and HRP officers, including those linked to serious internal misconduct, no one has contacted me. The CRCC has shown an institutional failure in protecting those involved and preventing harm.
Q2. On what date or approximate date were those children threatened?
A2.
Between December 10th and December 12th, 2019, over the course of several days.
Q3. Please describe the nature of the threats that were made towards the children.
A3.
The children were stalked by an unidentified vehicle over several days. Both the children and their parents noticed the vehicle's repeated presence. Eventually, one of the parents confronted and boxed in the vehicle. The driver identified himself as a “Private Investigator” and admitted to monitoring people in the area. This constituted targeted surveillance of minors, with no lawful explanation provided.
Q4. Who made the threats towards the children?
A4.
The identity of the individual remains unknown. When confronted, the person claimed to be a “Private Investigator” and was visibly shaken. While no direct verbal threats were made, his admission to active surveillance in a residential area where children were present and waiting for their bus is deeply concerning. The individual never clarified who had hired him or why the surveillance was taking place.
Q5. Where did this incident take place (please provide town/city and province)?
A5.
The incident occurred on Myra Road in Porters Lake, Nova Scotia. Although I did not live there at the time, that address was previously listed on my résumé, submitted exclusively to J.D. Irving during a job application in late 2018 or early 2019. I believe the use of that outdated address as a point of surveillance raises serious questions about how that information was accessed and for what purpose.
Q6. Were you present when these threats were made towards the children?
A6.
No, I was not present at the time. In late July 2020, I spoke with someone directly involved. During our conversation, I referenced a letter I was preparing to send — which I eventually released on August 5th, 2020. That letter appeared to have immediate political consequences, including the resignation of Nova Scotia Premier Stephen McNeil the following day.
When I raised the incident from December 2019, the individual I spoke with gasped in recognition and confirmed the details, adding that neighbours were also aware of the situation and had reported it to the RCMP — twice — yet received no response.
Q7. Are you the parent or legal guardian of any of the children who were threatened?
A7.
No. I am a cousin of the children involved.
Q8. To whom at the RCMP did you report these threats and on what date or approximate date did you do so?
A8.
To the best of my understanding, the initial threats were reported to the RCMP by neighbours between December 10th and 12th, 2019. I was informed of this after the fact, and to my knowledge, there was no meaningful follow-up by RCMP at that time.
I personally reiterated the concerns in the main email thread beginning in September 2021, and have continued to reference the threats up to the present. The incident was also documented in The Wolf and the Neural Network – ALPHA, released publicly on July 11th, 2022.
Further, the matter was reported directly to Jessica of the RCMP detachment in Sheet Harbour, though her response demonstrated clear bias. This bias is clearly audible in a recorded conversation from May 24th, 2023, which was followed by retaliatory behavior from Jessica Welke.
This was also reported to CRCC.
Q9. What, if anything, are you alleging a member(s) of the RCMP did that was improper in relation to this incident?
A9.
I allege that RCMP members failed to take any action when the incident was reported — either by the neighbours in 2019 or by me in multiple follow-ups. Instead of investigating, my concerns were dismissed without review. I was accused of lying and subjected to threats and intimidation.
This incident fits into a broader pattern of retaliation and misconduct linked to RCMP, HRP, J.D. Irving, and others. It connects to surveillance activities involving 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater NS, a location tied to confirmed GPS manipulation and spyware, as well as the resignation of senior officials.
The RCMP’s failure to act, combined with their targeting of me, points to systemic abuse and an effort to suppress the truth.
You stated that you reported that your “property was stolen”.
Q1. Please describe your property that was stolen.
A1. There were four separate incidents involving theft or disappearance of property, the most significant being:
May 27, 2019 – Theft of Wallet:
My wallet was stolen during a period that would later emerge as a major nexus point in The Wolf and the Neural Network investigation. This theft initiated a sequence of events involving Halifax Regional Police (HRP), RCMP, and intelligence-linked retaliation that remains unresolved.
I retrieved my wallet from HRP headquarters on June 5, 2019. Within 12 days of this recovery, J.D. Irving posted a job opening — Physical Security Manager (19002740) — which was ultimately filled by Jim Perrin, then Commander of HRP’s Criminal Investigation Unit and Superintendent. This transfer appears linked to broader institutional movement following the release of the Wortley Report and public controversy surrounding street checks.
This timeline overlaps again with events on November 19, 2019, when:
May 2019 serves as a key nexus, linking forward to major events, including:
This timeframe also aligns with the removal of EMIC contracts from the Government of Canada’s contract portal (https://search.open.canada.ca/contracts/), and events surrounding:
Each of these connections illustrates how a seemingly isolated property theft evolved into a larger pattern of suppression, surveillance, and institutional reshuffling directly tied to national security and political exposure.
September 15, 2020 – Critical correspondence from the Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC) and Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) went missing from my mailbox. This mail pertained to matters of jurisprudence and the application of PIPEDA (Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act).
EMIC Contract #2 and Residence B:
PIPEDA Argument:
Image of PIPEDA Argument (AI Rates 85- 90% at University Level with aesthetic tweaks):
Statement on Events: August 2–3, 2022 – HRP and NSHA Misconduct
On August 2, 2022, I went to Halifax Regional Police (HRP) Headquarters to file a formal complaint. Prior to this, on July 11, 2022, I had submitted The Wolf and the Neural Network – ALPHA version to the “Main Email Thread.” It contained over 400 chronologically ordered data points, most of which were hyperlinked and cross-referenced, outlining serious allegations implicating multiple institutions.
Rather than reviewing any part of this report or allowing me to file the complaint, HRP retaliated. Officers falsely claimed they were retrieving a complaint form. Instead, they returned and arrested me without cause.
NSHA staff would later fabricate a claim that I was “protesting” at HRP — a claim that was never made by HRP themselves, and is not found anywhere in their official records. In fact, HRP Professional Standards reviewed the video, and it clearly shows that I was calm, composed, and respectful — not protesting in any form.
There is no official statement from HRP officers explaining why I was taken to NSHA. This lack of documentation is a serious procedural failure.
I remained in handcuffs for over 10 hours, denied access to legal counsel at least five times. When I again requested a lawyer before a forced blood draw, I was told: “What’s the problem if you have nothing to hide?”
I was detained alongside another individual — a homeless man — who was visibly under the influence and admitted his state. He looked at me and said, “Man, if you’ve got a problem, this is the right place to be.”
That man — not me — was transferred to Mount Hope before I was. Disturbingly, my bookbag was sent with him, not with me. The following morning, he approached me and warned that police had gone through my bag. He even joked, asking if I wanted to play rock-paper-scissors for one of the twenty-dollar bills inside.
My bookbag had a large sticker on it with my name — “SCOTT” — clearly visible. Anyone seeing that person with the bag could reasonably assume he was Scott. The next day, the individual appeared extremely pale and withdrawn, suggesting he may have been in medical distress, likely due to withdrawal. He was removed shortly after.
This indicates that not only was my personal property and identity mishandled, but the individual may have been placed in immediate physical and medical danger, as well as long-term risk, by being exposed to officers and their "special interests."
This mirrors what Jonathan Jefferies, Ron Legere, and Patrick Curran did when they falsely accused me of sexual assault — a fabricated charge that allowed HRP to retaliate, threaten, and abuse me under the false cover of legitimacy.
My wallet contained sensitive identification, banking details, and my health card — all of which are classified as Personal Health Information (PHI) under both NSHA policy and legal definition as confirmed by Karen Hornberger, Director of Privacy (NSHA).
This PHI breach should have been immediately reported to SIMS (NSHA’s Security & Information Management System) for investigation. It was not.
Instead, Karen Hornberger and Douglas Grant (CPSNS) later issued false statements regarding my wallet and bookbag — despite the fact that Mount Hope notes clearly confirm the bag arrived before I did, alongside another client. Their lies are documented on the very first page of Mount Hope’s official record.
I have in my possession:
These materials prove that official records do not match the events captured in the recordings. From August 2–12, 2022, I was subjected to abuse, lies, and fabrication of records by multiple staff members at NSHA.
These include:
They operated under the assumption that each previous staff member “must be telling the truth,” and therefore I was the liar. This recursive failure created a self-justifying chain of negligence that allowed each party to escalate harm without accountability.
When you examine the triage notes and subsequent records, you will notice something critical: nowhere do they clarify whether I was or was not protesting — because to clarify would have directly contradicted the triage record, exposing it as false from the start. Instead, they left the record ambiguous and smeared with innuendo, ensuring deniability and shielding themselves from liability.
What happened was not a bureaucratic failure. It was targeted retaliation. These actions meet the legal threshold for:
As part of my contribution to national security and institutional reform, I have formally offered to:
I stand by every claim. The evidence is irrefutable.
www.TheWolfAndTheNeuralNetwork.com
Image evidence confirms that NSHA notes list the contents of my wallet and explicitly state that the book bag and belongings were brought in with a previous client. Multiple NSHA staff members later lied about this fact:
August 31, 2023 — NSHA Serves False Trespass Notice
On August 31st, 2023, I was served by a bailiff acting on behalf of the Nova Scotia Health Authority (NSHA). The envelope contained three copies of the same document, including carbon copies. A scanned version can be found here: https://tinyurl.com/kvf7pvj6.
The document falsely claims that I, Scott Jewers, am being trespassed from NSHA hospitals — which are public property and constitutionally protected under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms as essential health services.
It alleges that I was physically present at an undisclosed NSHA location on August 22, 2023, and that Anthony Jocko read the trespass notice to me in person at this location. It further states that Vishwaraj Gohil witnessed both my presence and the reading of the notice by Jocko.
This is entirely false:
The bailiff who delivered the documents told me they were simply given a name and phone number — and expressed confusion about the situation, stating it was not typical procedure. Furthermore, upon reviewing the document, the handwriting appears uniform across the form, suggesting that the same person may have filled out every section, including:
This raises serious concerns of document falsification — including the forgery of signatures of both a security officer and a witness.
Image showing the three copies of Trespass notice, Pink, Yellow and White. And that the same person completed the forms, including signing for the witness:
Q2. On what date or approximate date was your property stolen?
A2.
There were four key incidents involving theft or disappearance of property:
Q3. Who stole your property?
A3.May 27, 2019 – The individual(s) responsible for the theft remain unidentified. On May 31, 2022, under the direction of legal counsel (despite Scott Jewers pleading against it), a Freedom of Information (FOI) request was submitted to Halifax Regional Police regarding the stolen wallet. The FOI response stated the file was locked due to someone else’s privacy rights.
Notably, that same day, Kevin Mooney, President of Irving Shipbuilding, resigned — a significant development given the surrounding context. While direct attribution remains speculative, there is a compelling body of circumstantial evidence connecting the event to Jim Perrin (former HRP Commander) and HRP more broadly.
September 15, 2020 - A critical piece of mail from Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) went missing from my mailbox. ESDC has since confirmed that the original letter was sent. When they reissued a copy, it was sent with enhanced security — requiring me to go to the post office and sign for it in person. This clearly indicates that the original letter was either intercepted or stolen. This stolen correspondence related to jurisprudence and PIPEDA/PIEPDA applicability, and its contents had serious legal implications. If I had received it and remained silent, no one could have known what power or leverage that document afforded me. Its disappearance made it a critical point of interference.
Compounding this, it is now a non-contestable fact that my GPS was, without my consent, remotely set to 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater, Nova Scotia. This is spyware activity, either planted by:
This is not speculation. The address in question aligns with the known EMIC contracts — a company with ties to Cambridge Analytica, and whose contracts match the start date of Dan Kinsella becoming Chief of Police of Halifax Regional Police.
Of further concern:
There are also signs of a possible IMSI catcher (cellphone interception device) operating in this period — consistent with other forms of targeted surveillance and identity theft.
Given that the stolen letter likely included case numbers and personal data, its interception would have enabled malicious actors to impersonate me, and even frame me — fitting the broader pattern of digital and physical identity theft, spyware deployment, and evidence manipulation that I’ve been documenting for years.
August 2–3, 2022 – I was falsely arrested after attempting to file a formal complaint and speak directly with Chief Dan Kinsella. My intent was to warn him that it appeared someone may have been trying to frame him — a concern I believed was both institutionally significant and in the public interest.
I had exhausted every other available channel and had repeatedly asked for someone in authority to step forward and address the situation. No one did.
It now appears that the arrest and everything that followed was triggered by officers overhearing my conversation. Whether the resulting response came solely from HRP, another oversight body, or was executed in coordination with NSHA, what followed was a cascade of serious procedural failures — each compounded by deliberate misrepresentations and false documentation.
However, "mistakes" do not explain the actions of:
Their conduct — including record fabrication, obstruction of legal rights, and knowingly false statements — was not administrative error. It was malicious, calculated, and retaliatory.
These actions were not isolated misjudgments. They reflected clear forethought, coordination, and intent to harm.
August 31st, 2023 – My identity was stolen, and the Nova Scotia Health Authority (NSHA) issued a trespass notice based on completely fabricated claims. The document falsely alleges that I was present at an undisclosed NSHA location on August 22nd, 2023, and that Anthony Jocko read the notice to me in person, with Vishwaraj Gohil listed as a witness.
None of this happened.
I was not at any NSHA facility on or near that date.
No one from NSHA contacted me, read anything to me, or provided notice in any lawful way.
On reviewing the document, it is clear that the same person filled out the entire form, including forging the witness signature. This suggests a deliberate fabrication of official documents.
Despite multiple attempts to contact NSHA for clarification, no one responded. This establishes that all involved parties were — at minimum — complicit, compliant, and complacent in a fraudulent act carried out under the pretense of authority.
Exactly six days later, on September 6, 2023, Chief Dan Kinsella announced his retirement. Shortly after, RCMP Commissioner Dennis Daley announced there would be an official apology for Street Checks.
This incident directly ties back to:
By August 2023, it was already well established that I had completely dismantled the credibility of:
Additionally, Premier Tim Houston had personally shown up on January 29, 2023 — a date of critical significance in this investigation. His involvement is notably connected to Karen Oldfield, President and CEO of NSHA, whom he personally appointed. This reinforces the direct link between political leadership, NSHA executive oversight, and the escalating pattern of institutional retaliation I was exposing.
At this stage, all parties involved — including NSHA and law enforcement — had clear motive to frame me or remain silent. And so, nobody acted. Their inaction served their interests.
Q4. Where was your property stolen from (please provide address including town/city and province)?
A4.
Q5. To whom at the RCMP did you report this theft and on what date or approximate date did you do so?
A5. I reported the thefts and related incidents to Jessica Welke, Justin Hall, Chad Samford, and several other RCMP officers over multiple occasions. Despite my repeated efforts to file a formal complaint, I was refused each time. None of the officers provided a clear path forward or referred me to an appropriate resource.
I made these reports calmly and reasonably, pleading for assistance, yet I was met with indifference and, in some cases, thinly veiled threats. Officers repeatedly stated, “We don’t know who you would file a complaint with,” despite knowing the severity and legitimacy of my concerns.
Q6. What, if anything, are you alleging a member(s) of the RCMP did that was improper in relation to this incident?
A6. I am alleging that multiple members of the RCMP:
Rather than investigate the serious allegations I raised, members of the RCMP either obstructed or diverted the process entirely. These actions were not isolated mistakes — they formed a deliberate pattern of institutional retaliation and systemic abuse.
Image showing Facebook Post made May 26th 2023, 1 day before MHMCT contacted me, anticipating retaliation and asking people to listen. May 27th 2023 i would receive a call from MHMCT and no call from Jessica Welke:
Image showing YouTube video and link to the recorded call between Jessica Welke and Scott Jewers May 24th 2023:
IMAGE Showing EMIC Contracts were deleted, and i contacted Main Email Thread advising of this:
Image showing the EMIC Contract dates also match the Star Dates for HRP Chief of Police, Dan Kinsella:
