I currently have two active national security cases:

• RCMP Special Victims Unit
  Case #: 2025-21595
  Contact: 902-220-2013
• Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS)
  Case #: Attachment5566
  Contact: 613-993-9620

The CRCC is advised to self-report this matter to CSIS immediately, including your failure to log, respond to, or escalate a national security concern when it was first raised. Failure to do so will constitute further obstruction and be treated as evidence of CRCC staff — including David and Carol — actively interfering with or suppressing an ongoing national security investigation. This will be reported accordingly.

EMIC Contract #1 (Matching 9330 Highway #7 Stillwater NS)

Q1. Whose children were threatened and what are the children’s names?
A1.
The children who were threatened are relatives of mine. I will not disclose their names. These are minors who were surveilled by an unknown individual claiming to be a “Private Investigator,” and I have every reason to believe law enforcement either ignored or concealed this incident. Considering the level of retaliation I have personally faced, and the lack of any case number or meaningful follow-up, disclosing their identities would put them at further risk.
It has been over several years since this matter was raised, and despite being shared with multiple RCMP and HRP officers, including those linked to serious internal misconduct, no one has contacted me. The CRCC has shown an institutional failure in protecting those involved and preventing harm.

Q2. On what date or approximate date were those children threatened?
A2.
Between December 10th and December 12th, 2019, over the course of several days.

Q3. Please describe the nature of the threats that were made towards the children.
A3.
The children were stalked by an unidentified vehicle over several days. Both the children and their parents noticed the vehicle's repeated presence. Eventually, one of the parents confronted and boxed in the vehicle. The driver identified himself as a “Private Investigator” and admitted to monitoring people in the area. This constituted targeted surveillance of minors, with no lawful explanation provided.

Q4. Who made the threats towards the children?
A4.
The identity of the individual remains unknown. When confronted, the person claimed to be a “Private Investigator” and was visibly shaken. While no direct verbal threats were made, his admission to active surveillance in a residential area where children were present and waiting for their bus is deeply concerning. The individual never clarified who had hired him or why the surveillance was taking place.

Q5. Where did this incident take place (please provide town/city and province)?
A5.
The incident occurred on Myra Road in Porters Lake, Nova Scotia. Although I did not live there at the time, that address was previously listed on my résumé, submitted exclusively to J.D. Irving during a job application in late 2018 or early 2019. I believe the use of that outdated address as a point of surveillance raises serious questions about how that information was accessed and for what purpose.

Q6. Were you present when these threats were made towards the children?
A6.
No, I was not present at the time. In late July 2020, I spoke with someone directly involved. During our conversation, I referenced a letter I was preparing to send — which I eventually released on August 5th, 2020. That letter appeared to have immediate political consequences, including the resignation of Nova Scotia Premier Stephen McNeil the following day.
When I raised the incident from December 2019, the individual I spoke with gasped in recognition and confirmed the details, adding that neighbours were also aware of the situation and had reported it to the RCMP — twice — yet received no response.

Q7. Are you the parent or legal guardian of any of the children who were threatened?
A7.
No. I am a cousin of the children involved.

Q8. To whom at the RCMP did you report these threats and on what date or approximate date did you do so?
A8.
To the best of my understanding, the initial threats were reported to the RCMP by neighbours between December 10th and 12th, 2019. I was informed of this after the fact, and to my knowledge, there was no meaningful follow-up by RCMP at that time.

I personally reiterated the concerns in the main email thread beginning in September 2021, and have continued to reference the threats up to the present. The incident was also documented in The Wolf and the Neural Network – ALPHA, released publicly on July 11th, 2022.

Further, the matter was reported directly to Jessica of the RCMP detachment in Sheet Harbour, though her response demonstrated clear bias. This bias is clearly audible in a recorded conversation from May 24th, 2023, which was followed by retaliatory behavior from Jessica Welke.

This was also reported to CRCC.

Q9. What, if anything, are you alleging a member(s) of the RCMP did that was improper in relation to this incident?
A9.
I allege that RCMP members failed to take any action when the incident was reported — either by the neighbours in 2019 or by me in multiple follow-ups. Instead of investigating, my concerns were dismissed without review. I was accused of lying and subjected to threats and intimidation.
This incident fits into a broader pattern of retaliation and misconduct linked to RCMP, HRP, J.D. Irving, and others. It connects to surveillance activities involving 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater NS, a location tied to confirmed GPS manipulation and spyware, as well as the resignation of senior officials.
The RCMP’s failure to act, combined with their targeting of me, points to systemic abuse and an effort to suppress the truth.

Q1. Please describe your property that was stolen.

A1. There were four separate incidents involving theft or disappearance of property, the most significant being:

May 27, 2019 – Theft of Wallet:
My wallet was stolen during a period that would later emerge as a major nexus point in The Wolf and the Neural Network investigation. This theft initiated a sequence of events involving Halifax Regional Police (HRP), RCMP, and intelligence-linked retaliation that remains unresolved.

I retrieved my wallet from HRP headquarters on June 5, 2019. Within 12 days of this recovery, J.D. Irving posted a job opening — Physical Security Manager (19002740) — which was ultimately filled by Jim Perrin, then Commander of HRP’s Criminal Investigation Unit and Superintendent. This transfer appears linked to broader institutional movement following the release of the Wortley Report and public controversy surrounding street checks.

This timeline overlaps again with events on November 19, 2019, when:

• I received an unsolicited job opportunity email from the Government of Canada.
• Chief Dan Kinsella publicly announced an apology for street checks, reasonably part of the justification for Perrin’s transfer.
• Jim Perrin began his role at J.D. Irving.
• TorStar closed its Halifax bureau — a media outlet that, alongside Postmedia, was under scrutiny for collusion involving David Pugliese, J.D. Irving, and SaltWire, dating back to March 2019.

May 2019 serves as a key nexus, linking forward to major events, including:

• November 19, 2019, when several institutional and media shifts occurred.
• April 18, 2019, an earlier anchor date that ties into the investigation’s structural chronology.
• January 4, 2023, when Irving Shipbuilding was awarded a $1.6 billion federal contract — tracing back to developments initiated in May 2019.

Q1. Who was sexually assaulted and by whom?

A1. While I do not have the exact names of the individuals responsible, I can identify them functionally — meaning I know their roles, locations, and involvement during the time of the incident. The individuals involved were staff members or agents connected to Nova Scotia Health Authority (NSHA) and/or law enforcement personnel present during my detainment and transfer between Halifax Infirmary / QEII and Mount Hope on August 2–3, 2022.

I am prepared to testify under oath and provide supporting evidence, including audio recordings, institutional documents, and timeline logs identifying those present and involved in the chain of custody and care.

Q2. On what date or approximate date did the sexual assault occur?

A2.August 3^rd 2022

Q3. Where did the sexual assault occur (please provide address including town/city and province)?

A3. Halifax, Mount Hope Hospital (After i was falsely arrested for going to HRP to file a complaint)

Q4.  To whom at the RCMP did you report this sexual assault and on what date or approximate date did you do so?

A4.I initially reported the basis of the sexual assault on the night of August 3, 2022, the same day it occurred, via the Main Email Thread, which included 77 recipients across various institutions, including RCMP, HRP, NSHA, and legal oversight bodies. At the time, I was actively fearing further retaliation.

Specifically, I reported the assault or referenced it directly to the following RCMP members and related officials over the course of 2022–2023:

• Jessica Welke
• Justin Hall
• Chad Samford
• Sherry Charant
• Zachary Lechane
• Krista Pye
• Jonathan Jefferies (HRP Professional Standards)
• Ron Legere (HRP Professional Standards)
• Patrick Curran (Police Complaints Commissioner)
• As well as Kristen Holm and her staff member at NSHA

Despite this, no meaningful investigation or protection occurred. In some cases, the individuals listed either dismissed the claims, retaliated, or allowed further abuse to occur through inaction or complicity.

Q5. What, if anything, are you alleging a member(s) of the RCMP did that was improper in relation to this incident?

A5. I am alleging that members of the RCMP — particularly those at Sheet Harbour Detachment — acted with retaliation, disrespect, and willful negligence regarding my report of sexual assault and related criminal misconduct.

Rather than investigate, RCMP officers:

• Mocked and humiliated me, despite my clearly stating I am a technical expert presenting evidence of a serious incident.
• Refused to open a case, despite my direct request to “open a file and prove me wrong.”
• Engaged in stalking and intimidation, particularly in Sheet Harbour, where I had been actively involved in local anti-racism efforts.

One RCMP officer — whose name is known to me — stalked me at a location previously associated with criminal activity, where an image surfaced showing an RCMP police vest found on site. This same officer had also previously targeted me, making inappropriate and homophobic gestures, suggesting that I was being targeted, in part, because I am gay.

These incidents collectively reflect systemic misconduct, not only by individual officers but by the RCMP as an institution.

A particularly disturbing incident occurred on August 17, 2022, when I informed Constable Jessica Welke that my GPS had been remotely set to 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater, NS — a location tied to EMIC contracts, which are linked to election interference and surveillance programs.

In response:

• Jessica put her hands through her hair and said: “Did you think maybe you’re not supposed to know?”
• Another officer placed a hand on her shoulder to calm her and said something to the effect of: “You need to stop — this is way above our pay grade.”

This occurred after I had raised concerns about federal crimes, including possible hacking and evidence planting.

When I asked, “What do I do? Drive to the address and confront them?”
Jessica responded: “No! Do not go there.”

This response, along with their behavior, shows that the RCMP:

• Acknowledged the seriousness of the situation,
• Knew these were likely federal-level crimes,
• And yet refused to document or act, opting instead to ridicule, suppress, and silence me.

Q1. Please provide the address (including town/city and province) of each place that your reported to have been victim of a break and enter.

A1. January 29, 2023, shortly after 1:30 AM, I was at the hospital with my mother, who passed away that morning. While I was there, Premier Tim Houston also appeared at the hospital.

That same morning, neighbours observed lights moving around inside my residence, despite the home being unoccupied at the time. The address in question is:

[Full Address – if you would like to include it here, e.g., Street Name, City, Province]

Additionally, a family member at a Tim Hortons location nearby reported that a stranger entered the store, began talking about being with CSIS, and then abruptly left. Notably, neither my neighbour nor the family member knew about each other's experiences at the time — they came forward independently.

These events strongly suggest that my residence may have been entered without consent or lawful justification, during a moment of extreme personal vulnerability, and potentially in connection with state surveillance or intimidation tactics.

Image showing Break and Enters, CSIS events as well as Tim Houston showing up were all mentioned to Main Email Thread February 17^th 2023:

Q2. On what date(s) or approximate date(s) did each of those break and enters occur?

A2. January 29^th 2023, after 1:30AM

Q3.  Do you know who committed the break and enters?

A3.I do not have direct evidence identifying the individual(s) who entered my residence. However, based on the timing of the incident — occurring in the early hours of January 29, 2023, the same night my mother passed away — and in light of the ongoing pattern of targeted retaliation, I strongly suspect that the break-in was connected to members of the RCMP, or individuals acting on behalf of institutions involved in framing, torturing, and terrorizing me.

These are the same parties who have fabricated false records, covered up a sexual assault, and engaged in systematic retaliation throughout my case. Given the gravity of my mother’s passing, and the escalating legal exposure for those involved, it is highly likely this act was intended to:

• Justify or escalate their previous actions,
• Create a false narrative,
• Or even portray me as unstable — for example, by suggesting that “I imagined lights in my house.”

But there were witnesses, and I have withheld their identities to protect them from becoming targets themselves. This is precisely the tactic I believe these individuals rely on: forcing victims to expose the most vulnerable people in their circle, so they can be discredited or silenced.

In short, I believe this break-in was not random — it was part of a broader campaign of institutional abuse and psychological warfare designed to destroy credibility and avoid accountability.

Q4. Did you witness the break and enters?
A4.
No. The incident was reported to me by noon on January 29, 2023 by neighbours who observed suspicious activity, including lights moving around inside my home, while I was at the hospital.

Q5. What is your connection to each of the places that were victims of the break and enters?
A5.
The location is my personal residence — it is my primary home.

Q6. To whom at the RCMP did you report each of the break and enters and on what date or approximate date did you do so?
A6.
I reported the incident via the Main Email Thread on February 17, 2023, which included over 77 recipients, many of whom are connected to RCMP, HRP, NSHA, and oversight bodies.
In that message, I clearly outlined the context, including:

• The break-in,
• The suspicious timing coinciding with my mother's death,
• And the unusual presence of Premier Tim Houston at the hospital that morning.

Q7. What, if anything, are you alleging a member(s) of the RCMP did that was improper in relation to this/these incident(s)?
A7.
I am alleging that members of the RCMP:

• Failed to respond to credible evidence of a break and enter at my home,
• Ignored witness reports,
• And refused to investigate, despite being formally notified through multiple channels, including the Main Email Thread.

Given the timing — within hours of my mother's death — and the broader pattern of harassment, surveillance, and retaliation, it is reasonable to believe the RCMP either:

• Deliberately ignored the incident,
• Or were complicit in allowing it to happen as part of a continued campaign to intimidate and destabilize me.

Their inaction fits a documented pattern of:

• Retaliation against my protected disclosures,
• Negligence toward legitimate safety concerns,
• And institutional shielding of those already implicated in prior abuses.

Q1. What is your mother’s name?
A1. Debbie Jewers

Q2. On what date(s) or approximate date(s) was your mother threatened?
A2. From approximately December 10, 2019 through to January 23, 2023.

Q3. Please describe the nature of the possible threats that were made towards your mother.

A3. The nature of the threats against my mother was coercive, psychological, and deeply targeted, particularly given her disabled status. These threats appeared as part of a broader pattern of intimidation connected to my whistleblowing activities involving J.D. Irving, Irving Shipbuilding, HRP, and other institutional actors.

On December 10, 2019, I attended a government job interview in Halifax. The interview went extremely well, but neither I nor the panel mentioned my most recent employer — Irving Shipbuilding — which was highly unusual given it was prominently listed on my résumé. Notably, I had submitted a formal complaint to Irving Shipbuilding just 24 hours earlier.

Roughly 8 hours after the interview, as I was leaving the city, a Halifax Regional Police vehicle pulled in behind me and asked about a “woman in a nightdress” seen wandering the area. This was a highly specific and disturbing question, as my mother — who is disabled — was known to wear nightdresses, and HRP had previously been involved in welfare checks at her location.

This encounter occurred shortly after a chain of significant events, including:

• The theft of my wallet and involvement of HRP in May 2019
• The issuing of the EMIC contract on July 5, 2019, which is tied to surveillance infrastructure
• My complaint preparation submitted to DND on November 23, 2019, just days after the nexus date of November 19, 2019 — which is linked to multiple major personnel and media movements

Following these disclosures, I experienced:

• Targeted surveillance, including SUVs staking out children
• A documented near-plane collision (“planecident”) witnessed during that same December cluster of dates
• And increasing intimidation by HRP and affiliated actors

To add to this, the individual assigned to investigate my complaint against Irving Shipbuilding was none other than Jim Perrin, who had direct involvement with HRP during the period I reported misconduct — a clear conflict of interest.

In summary, the nature of the threats against my mother involved indirect targeting and psychological intimidation, clearly tied to my efforts to report corruption and systemic abuse. These acts appear deliberate, timed to coincide with formal complaints, and strategically designed to create fear and suppress further action.

Image includes my mother’s nightdresses, the location where the event occurred (with GPS metadata), and what appears to be a possible HRP log entry referencing the incident:

Q4. Who made the threats towards your mother?

A4. While it is difficult to name a specific individual with certainty, the threats toward my mother most likely originated from a combination of actors, both directly and indirectly involved. The most reasonable and evidenced parties include:

• Members of Halifax Regional Police (HRP) — given their prior involvement, the timing of their actions, and their proximity to my family, including an incident involving a reference to my mother’s nightdress shortly after I filed a formal complaint.
• At least one high-ranking individual within Irving Shipbuilding, an entity that stood to lose significantly from my disclosures and legal filings.
• Government officials or senior public servants, who may have participated in or approved covert retaliation due to the political risk and institutional exposure posed by my work.
• The RCMP, who had a clear motive to deflect attention and frame a target following the fallout from the Mark Norman affair, and to shield systemic misconduct.
• The Department of National Defence (DND), federal government, and media conglomerates including Postmedia and TorStar, all of whom had potential interests in suppressing the truth — particularly given the political, economic, and national security implications surrounding:
  • The EMIC contracts,
  • The appointment of Dan Kinsella (whose sudden transfer from Ontario raises questions),
  • And the November 19, 2019 nexus date, which links multiple institutional changes, resignations, and media closures.

Taken together, these parties had both motive and opportunity, and their actions appear to have been part of a coordinated effort to silence me by targeting the most vulnerable person in my life — my disabled mother.

Q5. Where did this incident take place (please provide town/city and province)?

A5. The incident took place in Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, specifically in the McDonald’s parking lot on Main Street.

Q6. Were you present when these possible threats were made towards your mother?

A6. Yes, I was present at the time.

Q7. To whom at the RCMP did you report these threats and on what date or approximate date did you do so?

A7.I began reporting these threats to the RCMP in September 2021, and have continued to do so through to the present. These reports were made both directly and via the Main Email Thread, which included dozens of institutional and government recipients. The threats coincided with multiple other serious events, many of which are documented and time-stamped in The Wolf and the Neural Network (TWNN) timeline

Q8. What, if anything, are you alleging a member(s) of the RCMP did that was improper in relation to this incident?

A8. I am alleging that RCMP members:

• Ignored credible and substantiated reports of threats against a disabled individual,
• Obstructed accountability, despite having access to overwhelming evidence, and
• Actively attempted to discredit me, rather than address the misconduct I reported.

On July 11, 2022, I submitted TWNN – Alpha to oversight and law enforcement agencies, including RCMP. It contained over 400 chronologically organized data points, with more than 90% hyperlinked and cross-referenced, clearly outlining:

• The timeline of abuse,
• My false arrest,
• The sexual assault, and
• The coordinated institutional retaliation.

From that point forward, every RCMP interaction with me occurred in full knowledge of that evidence base. They could have easily opened a legitimate dialogue by saying, “Let’s talk about November 19, 2019,” and reviewing the material. Instead, they acted to conceal it.

On September 17, 2022, I was contacted by someone claiming to be with New Glasgow RCMP, referencing a harmless ASCII wolf I had included in my email signature. I fully cooperated, offered to add them to the email thread for transparency, and clearly stated that something serious had happened.

Instead of following proper procedure, the RCMP appeared to be laying the groundwork for a false case against me — a retaliatory strategy because they knew they had been exposed through my disclosures.

Image of the harmless ASCII Wolf:

First, thank you for the condolences.
I understand that this may be a general formality, but I feel it’s worth noting that only two institutions or individuals have acknowledged my mother’s passing — despite the gravity of everything surrounding it. So even if this is simply part of the process, credit is due for at least attempting to be good people.

Q1. On what date(s) or approximate date(s) did the Premier show up?
A1.
January 29, 2023, at approximately 1:30 AM.

Q2. Where did this incident take place (please provide town/city and province)?
A2.
St. Martha’s Regional Hospital, in Antigonish, Nova Scotia.

Q3. Why would you report the Premier showing up to the RCMP?
A3.
On February 17, 2023, I reported the incident through the Main Email Thread, which includes RCMP, legal, and government recipients. I openly disclosed my personal bias, included statements from others, and provided a detailed account of what happened.
The presence of the Premier of Nova Scotia at 1:30 AM on the exact morning of my mother’s death, following years of documented surveillance, retaliation, and misconduct, is not a coincidence — and it raised immediate concerns about orchestration, awareness, and cover-up at the highest levels of provincial leadership.

Q4. To whom at the RCMP did you report the Premier showing up and on what date or approximate date did you do so?
A4.
On March 13, 2023, I directly told Constable Jessica Welke. I also reiterated the report through the Main Email Thread.
I sat down with Jessica Welke again on March 29, 2023, and once more on April 1, 2023, where I offered my full cooperation, transparency, and reiterated the gravity of what had occurred.

Q5. What, if anything, are you alleging a member(s) of the RCMP did that was improper in relation to this incident?
A5.
Everything about their response was improper.
By the time of this incident, RCMP were fully aware of the volume and credibility of the evidence I had already submitted — including TWNN – Alpha, emails, timelines, GPS data, and formal complaints going back years.

Instead of investigating, they:

• Retaliated repeatedly
• Harassed and threatened me
• Showed up while I was walking with blisters on my feet to see my dying mother
• And used the full weight of the institution to protect others and suppress the truth

Each time they showed up and refused to act, they knew it only made things worse for them legally, and so the retaliation escalated. They didn’t just fail to protect me — they actively tried to break me.
And they did so knowing that other institutions — NSHA, HRP, Irving Shipbuilding, and the provincial government — were implicated, and also had everything to lose if the truth came out.

Image from the first page of the February 17, 2023 submission regarding Premier Tim Houston’s appearance at St. Martha’s Hospital on the morning of my mother’s passing. This document was sent to the “Main Email Thread” and includes details about the suspected break and enter, as well as a family member’s account of an individual claiming to be from CSIS:

Q1. Did you make the report to the RCMP or did a third party make the report to the RCMP that SUVs were stalking children?
A1.
The parents of some of the children made the reports directly to the RCMP. To my understanding, it was reported twice.

Q2. Where did the stalking take place (please provide town/city and province)?
A2.
The incident occurred in Porters Lake, Nova Scotia, on Myra Road, a few kilometers in from the main entrance.

Q3. Did you personally witness the stalking?
A3.
No, I did not personally witness the incident.

Q4. If you reported the stalking, to whom at the RCMP did you report the stalking and on what date or approximate date did you do so?
A4.
I did not personally report it, but to my understanding, it was reported by the parents involved to the RCMP around December 12, 2019. Given the ongoing and documented retaliation I have experienced from RCMP and related agencies, I believe it would be unwise to publicly name the reporting parties. However, this date should be sufficient for the CRCC and RCMP to verify whether two calls were received, as claimed.

Q5. Are you the parent or legal guardian of any of the children in question?
A5.
No, I am not. However, I am a family member and closely connected to those who were affected.

Q6. What, if anything, are you alleging a member(s) of the RCMP did that was improper in relation to this incident?
A6.
I am alleging that members of the RCMP deliberately ignored and suppressed the reports made by parents regarding suspected stalking of minors by unidentified individuals in SUVs.

Further, based on subsequent patterns of surveillance, harassment, and retaliation I’ve documented, it is now reasonably suspected that members of HRP, RCMP, and possibly Irving Shipbuilding were involved in — or at minimum benefited from — a coordinated effort to frame me, beginning with events tied to the Mark Norman case and escalating throughout 2019 and beyond.

The failure to investigate credible reports of potential child endangerment, combined with surveillance tactics used against myself and my family, suggests the RCMP was not acting in good faith, and may have instead been working to protect internal interests or suppress witnesses.

Q1. Who/what was being hacked and phished?
A1.
My personal communications, identity, and accounts were targeted through both spyware and phishing. This included my Gmail accounts, phone GPS, and impersonated legal contacts. On July 29, 2022, I warned that email spoofing was harder to fake than phone calls and pointed out that government websites even warn of spoofed numbers. Within days, I received an email from Valent Legal’s domain impersonating staff. Valent Legal later confirmed their system may have been compromised. I also had my GPS forcibly rerouted to 9330 Highway #7 Stillwater, NS — a location tied to EMIC, a company linked to Cambridge Analytica and election interference.

Q2. Where did this incident take place (please provide town/city and province)?
A2.
Halifax, Nova Scotia — but the GPS spoofing and phishing elements spanned multiple systems, including provincial and federal agencies. The phishing email impersonating Valent Legal was received while I was in Halifax. The GPS manipulation directed me to Stillwater, Nova Scotia.

Q3. On what date(s) or approximate date(s) did this hacking and phishing take place?
A3.

• July 29, 2022 — I warned Valent Legal about spoofing threats.
• August 1, 2022 — I received a phishing email from their domain.
• August 2, 2022 — I went to HRP to file a complaint and was falsely arrested the same day.
• The GPS location change to 9330 Highway #7 occurred in 2020 and was noticed during my investigation into spyware and tracking.
• Several phishing and identity manipulation events have occurred since 2019, including stolen mail in 2020.

Q4. To whom at the RCMP did you report the stalking and on what date or approximate date did you do so?
A4.
I reported the incident through multiple channels. The key report was made under RCMP Special Victims Unit Case #: 2025-21595.
The stalking and surveillance were also reported publicly and to oversight agencies. Specific RCMP officers’ names may not have been provided to me directly, but I have been transparent with CSIS, the RCMP, and relevant bodies since at least 2022.

Q5. What, if anything, are you alleging a member(s) of the RCMP did that was improper in relation to this incident?
A5.
I am alleging that certain RCMP members, knowingly or through negligence, failed to investigate or report credible evidence of stalking, digital surveillance, phishing, identity theft, and GPS manipulation. In fact, after attempting to report these concerns, I was falsely arrested on August 2, 2022, at Halifax Regional Police headquarters — an arrest that appeared coordinated and retaliatory. Additionally, by allowing cases to remain open without action, some officers may have participated in systemic obstruction or been complicit in enabling external interference, including foreign threats tied to election manipulation.

Image of the email chain with Valent Legal, showing that I reported the breach within 3 hours and 6 minutes. The firm later confirmed that they did not send the email in question but also shows evidence regarding another phishing event with Burchells LLP and Burchells Lightning protection:

Image shows confirmed AI reviews (ChatGPT and GROK) verifying the email header data, confirming that the message was, in fact, sent from Valent Legal’s domain. This means either Valent Legal is lying — or their system was compromised:

Q1. Is this the same hacking and phishing you referred to in the paragraph above?
A1.
Yes, it includes the same hacking and phishing events previously described — including unauthorized access to my devices, GPS manipulation, and a phishing email impersonating Valent Legal, sent shortly before my false arrest on August 2, 2022. However, this also includes additional incidents tied specifically to election interference efforts, targeting both federal communications infrastructure and public perception management, which are detailed in The Wolf and the Neural Network (TWNN).

Q2. If not, which elections are you referring to?
A2.
The incidents directly relate to the 2019 and 2021 Canadian Federal Elections. There is credible reason to believe that actors connected to Cambridge Analytica affiliates, including those associated with the EMIC contracts, along with elements in media, law enforcement, and intelligence-linked contractors, attempted to influence electoral outcomes by targeting individuals such as myself — individuals in possession of sensitive institutional timelines, whistleblower material, and cross-sector conflicts. This involved both digital interference and physical surveillance.

There is also significant evidence to suggest that these same mechanisms affected provincial elections — particularly in Nova Scotia, with strong data correlations tied to both Stephen McNeil and Tim Houston across multiple election periods. The same applies to other provinces, including Ontario and Alberta, where institutional behaviors mirror those patterns.

These matters were not addressed in the Foreign Interference Committee (2024–2025). As a result, it is impossible for Canadian systems to claim they fully understand or prepared for the scope and depth of impact. The Foreign Interference Committee was formally contacted on December 27, 2024, and Elections Canada was contacted again shortly thereafter (with an earlier complaint submitted in early 2023, which they failed to act on).

I currently have two active national security cases:

• RCMP Special Victims Unit
  Case #: 2025-21595
  Contact: 902-220-2013
• Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS)
  Case #: Attachment5566
  Contact: 613-993-9620

The CRCC is advised to self-report this matter to CSIS immediately, including your failure to log, respond to, or escalate a national security concern when it was first raised. Failure to do so will constitute further obstruction and be treated as evidence of CRCC staff — including David and Carol — actively interfering with or suppressing an ongoing national security investigation. This will be reported accordingly.

Q3. Where did this incident take place (please provide town/city and province)?
A3.
The incidents occurred across multiple locations in Nova Scotia, including:

• Halifax (where the phishing email was received, and the arrest occurred)
• Dartmouth (where surveillance was observed and GPS manipulation originated)
• Ecum Secum (where sensitive government correspondence from ESDC went missing from my mailbox)

Additionally, data compromise and interception likely occurred through federal infrastructure, suggesting potential national or cross-border reach.

Q4. On what date(s) or approximate date(s) did this hacking and phishing take place?
A4.
Key dates include:

• May 27, 2019 – Initial evidence of tracking and wallet theft (leading to identity compromise)
• Early 2020 – My GPS was remotely set to 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater, NS (spyware location tied to EMIC contracts)
• September 15, 2020 – Missing ESDC correspondence (mailbox theft)
• August 1, 2022 – I received a phishing email from Valent Legal’s domain, which they later stated they did not send
• August 2–3, 2022 – I was falsely arrested before I could file a complaint on the record but had absolutely everything compiled. Along with 18 Years experience. Experience. It can be verified in TWNN Alpha released July 11^th 2022.

Q5. To whom at the RCMP did you report the stalking and on what date or approximate date did you do so?
A5.
Reports were made to multiple RCMP members over a sustained period. The following individuals were either directly informed or engaged during related incidents:

• Jessica Welke – Reporting began in August 2022 and continued through the present. Notable direct contact dates include:
  • March 13, 2023
  • March 29, 2023
  • April 1, 2023
• Justin Hall – From August 2022 to present. Multiple Times.
• Chad Samford – From August 2022 to present. Multiple Times.
• Sherry Charant – Believed to have been aware as early as August 2022, though I did not speak with her directly until she and Krista Pye appeared at my residence on February 14, 2025.
• Zachary Lechane – First believed contact in March 2024; later appeared alongside Krista Pye on February 21, 2025.
• Krista Pye – Appeared with Sherry Charant on February 14, 2025, and again with Zachary Lechane on February 21, 2025.
• Unknown RCMP officer (Sheet Harbour) – Identified by a rat and top hat tattoo on his leg. First contact in August 2022; later returned wearing a body camera while dropping off evidence on July 27, 2023.
• Two RCMP officers from Sherbrooke detachment – Interacted in November 2022.
• Corporal Atwell (RCMP Musquodoboit Harbour) – Contact occurred in August 2022.
• Corporal Stevens (RCMP liaison via CRCC) – Contact made around September 10, 2023.

In addition, formal reports were circulated via the Main Email Thread, which began on or around July 26, 2021, and remains active to this day. That thread includes over 77 recipients, spanning:

• Law firms
• HRP and RCMP officers
• Government officials
• Representatives of J.D. Irving
• And other relevant institutional and private parties

All relevant information and incident patterns were thoroughly documented in TWNN – Alpha, which was submitted on July 11, 2022. This version of The Wolf and the Neural Network contained over 400 data points, with more than 90% hyperlinked and cross-referenced, allowing for full traceability. I also explicitly disclosed all known personal biases, and made it clear that I never claimed the material was “100% about me.”

In fact, I applied a structured reasoning method I first described to J.D. Irving in 2020, which I called “non-zero reasoning.” The approach aimed for a 70% accuracy average, with a focus on pattern recognition across data clusters — not on isolated certainty. I stated this methodology openly and transparently.

This evidentiary record:

• Proves that Halifax Regional Police (HRP) falsely arrested and retaliated against me in August 2022
• Shows that NSHA fabricated documentation and attempted to retroactively justify false claims
• And demonstrates, beyond question, that I was extensively prepared, organized, and acting in good faith

The institutional response to TWNN – Alpha wasn’t to engage with the data — it was to silence, discredit, and suppress the person who compiled it.

Q6. What, if anything, are you alleging a member(s) of the RCMP did that was improper in relation to this incident?
A6.
RCMP members did not simply make errors — they engaged in a coordinated campaign of obstruction, retaliation, and systemic abuse that escalated into actions consistent with domestic terrorism, hate crimes, and human trafficking under Canadian and international law.

Specifically, I am alleging the following:

• They ignored and actively concealed credible evidence of national security breaches, including:
  • The hacking of legal institutions such as Burchells Lightning Protection, which reported their phone systems compromised
  • GPS evidence planting (including the forced setting of my phone to 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater, NS — a location tied to spyware and EMIC contracts)
  • Evidence tampering, surveillance, and possible election interference, with direct timing overlap to the 2019 and 2021 Canadian federal elections
• They failed to alert CSIS when directly informed of these threats, despite being explicitly told it constituted a national security issue. This alone may constitute criminal negligence under national security legislation.
• They retaliated against me — not only by falsely arresting me, but by using the Mental Health Mobile Crisis Team (MHMCT) as a weaponized proxy to build a false mental health record in an attempt to discredit me. This amounts to state-enabled psychological warfare and targeted hate crimes, particularly given:
  • My sexuality (as a gay man)
  • My protected activities as a whistleblower
  • My role as a technical expert exposing institutional misconduct
• Their conduct escalated to clear indicators of human trafficking, including:
  • Unlawful detainment, transfer, and identity misrepresentation (e.g., sending my bookbag to Mount Hope with another individual, creating the false appearance that person was “Scott”)
  • Denial of access to legal counsel, essential medical care, and constitutional rights over a 10-day period (August 2–12, 2022)
  • Coercive control tactics, including surveillance, isolation, and gaslighting — which meet modern international criteria for state-complicit trafficking and psychological captivity
• They dismissed TWNN – Alpha, despite it containing over 400 documented, cross-referenced, and chronologically organized data points, each directly relevant to:
  • Surveillance activity
  • Institutional misconduct
  • Election interference indicators
  • Resignation timelines tied to J.D. Irving, HRP, NSHA, and federal officials

Their refusal to act was not passive negligence — it was strategic, coordinated, and in direct service of institutional preservation. These actions undermined public trust, federal oversight, and national security.

And still — after all that — they left me to warn the country on my own.

This is a formal request for criminal charges and a federal investigation into systemic and sustained misconduct committed by members of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, supported by overwhelming evidence, testimony, and documentation submitted in The Wolf and the Neural Network (TWNN – Alpha) and corroborated through official records, correspondence, and institutional silence.

This case is not just about misconduct — it meets the thresholds of criminal conspiracy, torture, and human trafficking under international law, with elements of Target Audience Analysis (TAA) and psychological warfare used to destabilize, control, and silence a whistleblower.

Additions to the Criminal Offences Previously Alleged:

7. Torture (Charter s. 12 + UNCAT Article 1)

• I was subjected to psychological and physical torture, including:
  • Extended detainment without due process
  • Threats of forced sedation and medical procedures
  • Denial of legal counsel despite repeated requests
  • Cruel, degrading treatment while in handcuffs for over 10 hours
  • Isolation, coercion, and false mental health narratives weaponized by law enforcement and NSHA in tandem

This treatment meets the standard set out in Article 1 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture (UNCAT), to which Canada is a signatory.

8. Psychological Warfare / TAA-Based Profiling

• RCMP members and associated actors engaged in a form of Target Audience Analysis, profiling me psychologically and using:
  • Emotional targeting
  • Induced vulnerability
  • Trigger-based retaliation
  • Public humiliation tactics
  • Coordinated digital and physical manipulation (e.g., spoofed emails, false narratives, public surveillance)

These are the same methodologies used in military-grade psychological operations and are entirely inappropriate in a domestic law enforcement context — particularly against a civilian reporting institutional abuse.

9. Human Trafficking (UN Palermo Protocol Definition)

Under the UN Palermo Protocol (2000), human trafficking is defined to include:

“The abuse of power or of a position of vulnerability, or the giving or receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the consent of a person having control over another person, for the purpose of exploitation.”

The RCMP, in collaboration with NSHA and other actors, engaged in conduct that meets this standard:

• They exploited my position of vulnerability while I was caring for my disabled mother and reporting misconduct
• They exerted coercive control over me via MHMCT, false imprisonment, and institutional gaslighting
• They transferred my personal property (bookbag, wallet, records) to another person labeled as “Scott” to confuse identity, falsify continuity, and strip me of legal status
• They knowingly allowed false medical records to be created and used this to facilitate continued containment and degradation

These actions were not administrative accidents — they were structured mechanisms of control and suppression, fitting the modern international legal standard of state-facilitated trafficking and exploitation.

Charter of Rights and Fundamental Justice Violations:

In addition to the Criminal Code and international law violations, the RCMP has violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, including:

• Section 7 – Life, liberty, and security of the person
• Section 8 – Protection against unlawful search and seizure
• Section 9 – Freedom from arbitrary detention
• Section 10 – Right to counsel upon arrest
• Section 12 – Protection from cruel and unusual punishment
• Section 15 – Right to equality and protection from discrimination

The denial of legal access, the physical and psychological abuse, and the use of MHMCT as a retaliatory instrument constitute clear constitutional violations, reinforced by the fact that all actions occurred after RCMP had received TWNN – Alpha, containing over 400 data points of documented abuse, most hyperlinked and cross-referenced.

Conclusion: The RCMP Has Brought the Administration of Justice into Disrepute

The RCMP has failed its constitutional, ethical, and legal obligations at every level. Instead of investigating, they retaliated. Instead of protecting, they persecuted. Instead of acknowledging misconduct, they tried to erase the whistleblower.

Through a combination of:

• False arrest
• Suppression of evidence
• Surveillance of my disabled mother
• Sexual assault cover-up
• Use of healthcare systems for coercion
• Interference in federal matters (DND, national security, election integrity)

…the RCMP has brought the administration of justice into disrepute.

The institution now stands not just accused of negligence, but of criminal conspiracy, abuse of power, and participation in human rights violations.